Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

Started by hartiberlin, February 20, 2011, 06:14:05 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

hartiberlin

Quote from: markdansie on March 16, 2011, 01:36:00 PM
@evolvinggape
"Erm... no, the replacement of Batteries with Caps is not irrelevant at all. Batteries have a stored potential, Caps have an applied potential. Caps would very quickly show whether your circuit is running down or not and consuming power. 6 car Batteries would hide this extremely well even over lengthy testing periods."

So well put. This has been the failing of many experiments. I have even seen others even fool themselves when using a power supply. That's why many people I know prefer to use caps.
Mark

Yes, but sometimes these things just only work when using lead acid or NiMh batteries
as is the case with pulsed battery boosters like Bedini or Newman or Joule Thief style circuits.

Caps just don´t work here cause they don´t have the right electrons-ions in them...

Regards, Stefan.
Stefan Hartmann, Moderator of the overunity.com forum

markdansie

O dear
for the first time ever I have been out under the moderators control.
Well I guess thats the way it has to go
Bye everyone
Kind Regards
'Mark

markdansie

One thing I always admired about this forum was even when under fire from the zealots (remember Mylow punch up) free speech and the right to allow reason to have a voice was supported. Other forums (especially Sterling's) relied on heavy censorship.
And now we have by far the majority of contributors challenging methodologies used by Rosie and next thing before we know it censorship. There is no room for censorship in scientific debate.
I have tried to use some subtle humor, but was never abusive which is more than I can say for Rosie. Anyone who questions anything gets a spray.
I respect and value all opinions but may not always agree with them.
It is highly unlikely this will get through...the new world order is here already. LOL
Well in the scheme of things WTF.
I guess my real concern is "who else is being sensored?"
Kind Regards
Mark

hartiberlin

Okay, I just read the whole thread now and looked deeper into the
new Rosemary circuit.

As I did see already the picture of her setup about a month ago
I also still have some issues with it.

The issues I see are missing notes:
1. Rosemary,
was the ciurcuit  also run without connecting the scope
and just connecting the function generator ?

I earlier pointed out that ground loop
currents of the scopes and the function generator can add up
and extract some power via the grounding of the different devices.

As the circuit goes into selfrunning oscillation at around 1.5 Mhz
due to the parasitric LC components of the circuits, it could
be that it also extracts power via the groundloop currents, if these
exist there simular to the Kapanadze devices.

So please disconnect the scopes and also disconnect the ground
connector from your function generator and see, if you still
have this high 40 Watts heat output in the load resistor.


2. The circuit just oscillates when it has a negative bias at the gates,
so it would be easy just to use a battery with a voltge divider pot to
control the necessary voltage for it.
Then you would not need anymore the function generator and can see,
if it will also oscillate with the right negative bias voltage at the gates
and have this high 40 Watts heat output at the load heating resistor.

3. Rosemary, please post a PDF File or
at least higher Res screen shots of the scope shots,
otherwise we can not analyze the waveforms.

4. A simulation is just wasted time as it would not include
anomalous effects, so just forget it.

5.  Battery operated could be the only way it could work,
cause battery chemistry behaves totally different than normal power
supplies as is also seen in Bedini devices, where the OU energy seems
to come inside the batteries as the ions just move so slow...

6. Was the scope set to DC or AC in the input as you scoped
the voltage  on the batteries  ?

This is pretty important.

7. Was the scope set to DC or AC in the input as you scoped
the voltage  on the gates  ?


This circuit is simular to a Newman coil circuit running just at higher frequencies
and at lower inductances.
The MOSFETs with their included zener diodes can just
feed the BackEMF spikes back to the battery.

Now and the difference between 6 and 40 Watts heat should be easily measureable just by using
heated water calorimetrically.

Regards, Stefan.

P.S: I cleaned this thread up and deleted some offtopic messages and flame war messages...
Please stay ontopic. Thanks.
Stefan Hartmann, Moderator of the overunity.com forum

hartiberlin

Here is the picture of the setup that she already posted in a small size.

Regards, Stefan.
Stefan Hartmann, Moderator of the overunity.com forum