Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[Poit]

Many thanks guys.  Much appreciated. 

I would be very glad if you could just spread the word.  I'm hoping that this will generate some widespread interest on the internet - mainly to ensure that this event doesn't get lost for want of attention.

Great to be back here - but I have very little time to post.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

If you truly have a over unity device then your problem isn't trying to get people interested, it would be quite the opposite. Any genuine over unity device would also be a guaranteed crowd gather device too lol

[happyfunball]

Report on the demo:

http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/

[ltseung888]

Congratulation to Rosie and team on a successful demonstration.

Academics will now ask: Is the Rosie Circuit an OPEN system bringing-in energy from the environment?  In Aaron’s words: OPEN system in non-equilibrium thermodynamics?

Or would they look at my classical explanation of “energy is brought-in” at resonance via the ordered pulsing?

[happyfunball]

Congratulation to Rosie and team on a successful demonstration.

Academics will now ask: Is the Rosie Circuit an OPEN system bringing-in energy from the environment?  In Aaron’s words: OPEN system in non-equilibrium thermodynamics?

Or would they look at my classical explanation of “energy is brought-in” at resonance via the ordered pulsing?

Whatever happened to your lead-out wheel? Powering any light bulbs these days?

[TinselKoala]

Well... congratulations on getting such a comprehensive report out so very quickly. One almost wonders whether the report had been prepared in advance of the actual demonstration.

There are many problems with this report, but I'll just point out one serious one. The "Control Experiment" where DC power at various power levels was applied, and stable temperatures plotted, is a proper control experiment. But it wasn't used properly, unfortunately.
In an EXPERIMENT, a researcher varies one or more "independent variables" and measures the effect of this variation on "dependent variables". In the present case the Independent variable of interest is the POWER SUPPLY, whether DC or the Ainslie circuit, and one dependent variable of interest is the time-temperature curve that results from each supply. We are presented with data from the DC circuit supplying power at various levels, and we should be supplied with a graph from the Ainslie circuit supplying power at the same levels... but we aren't. Nor are we shown anything like a graph of supply voltage versus time for the Ainslie circuit, nor are we shown any evidence AT ALL that the batteries are actually being recharged. Get two sets of batteries, use one set to heat up the load at DC power to a certain temperature and hold it. Use the second set of batteries to power the Ainslie circuit to achieve the SAME time-temp profile as in the DC case. Run both circuits for a given time. Then disconnect the batteries and run a load test... not a "Voltage" test, but a real battery load test, putting a constant load on them and timing how long it takes to run down.

These tests are easy, obvious, and are ACTUAL tests of the Ainslie conjectures. However, you don't see them being performed. At least, not since I did them, nearly two years ago now.

As a paper reporting an experiment, there are some major areas that need revision. As an experiment itself, it needs to be severely redesigned in order ACTUALLY to test any well-formed hypothesis that might be constructed from Rosemary's conjectures.