Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[vonwolf]

   I think Rosemary's whole reason for doing these various circuits and measurements is to help validate her thesis which is based on unorthodox physics not commonly believed to exist. I fail to understand why anyone would expect tests run on a simulation based on the current physics that Rose is trying to contradict to show her new concepts? Of course the simulation is going to show a different results than Her team gets, what would be the point in doing any of this if it could just be run on a simulation?
    Oh well I had to ask, Rose I haven't said hello for a while good luck.
Pete 

  & Magulvin I just edited this and it looks like Wilby's correct

[teslaalset]

Poiyt, would it be possible for you to post the zipped PSpice project of your latest circuit?

B.t.w. be careful with putting the Watt probe on the battery. The power indicated is reversed in polarity.
I've noticed this before. It's very misleading
You can check it with a simple circuit only existing of a battery and a resistor.

[poynt99]

Poiyt, would it be possible for you to post the zipped PSpice project of your latest circuit?

B.t.w. be careful with putting the Watt probe on the battery. The power indicated is reversed in polarity.
I've noticed this before. It's very misleading
You can check it with a simple circuit only existing of a battery and a resistor.

Hi teslaalset.

Have you seen this post above?
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10407.msg282734#msg282734

I'm quite aware of the negative power indication when the W probe is placed on any source, and this is correct as I pointed out both in the above post, and on the scope shot text.

Good that you're on the ball though

.99

[Sprocket]

   I think Rosemary's whole reason for doing these various circuits and measurements is to help validate her thesis which is based on unorthodox physics not commonly believed to exist. I fail to understand why anyone would expect tests run on a simulation based on the current physics that Rose is trying to contradict? Of course the simulation is going to show a different results than Her team gets, what would be the point in doing any of this if it could just be run on a simulation?
    Oh well I had to ask, Rose I haven't said hello for a while good luck.
Pete

That point has been made more than once - ie. no simulation software can simulate scalar waves etc. whether by accident or design.  Yet they keep being put forward as 'proof' that the real circuit must be wrong!  That said, I think Rosemary actually asked for some of these simulations to be done, so she can't complain too loudly...

[vonwolf]

That point has been made more than once - ie. no simulation software can simulate scalar waves etc. whether by accident or design.  Yet they keep being put forward as 'proof' that the real circuit must be wrong!  That said, I think Rosemary actually asked for some of these simulations to be done, so she can't complain too loudly...

  Your right I think I even saw Harti comment on this so it might be a bit redundant but its like I said I haven't said Hi to Rose in a while and I by no means was representing Rosemary's stance on this.

Pete