Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[i_ron]

I think you know what I am getting at. If not then I'll certainly try my best to help you understand.

.99

Yes, all too well. But what you may have missed here is it is all right if you post one circuit and talk about another, I'm supposed to understand. Yet if Rosemary where to post similarly, then it is the end of the world.

Ron

[Rosemary Ainslie]

The confusions that have been visited on this really simple circuit are confusions that Poynt is relying on â€" in his efforts to utterly obfuscate this circuit design.

Guys â€" look at his post 994 â€" if it is still post 994.  Otherwise â€" the post thereby â€" that shows the underside of the circuit board.  NOTA BENE.  The ground is shown on the far side of the CSR.  That IS how we configured it for the DEMONSTRATION â€" because we ran out of space on the only available NODE.  That is NOT how we configure it for our ongoing standard tests where we ONLY USE THE LECROY. 

SO.  Here’s how it’s ALWAYS configured AND NOT AS IT WAS CONFIGURED FOR THE DEMO.

Q1 GATE to Q2 SOURCE
Q1 DRAIN to Q2 DRAIN
Q1 SOURCE to Q2 GATE.

Functions Generator INPUT to Q1 GATE
Functions Generator GROUND to Q2 GATE.

THAT’s how it’s configured. And that’s how it needs to be configured.  HOWEVER â€" if you â€" for any reason CANNOT put the ground directly onto Q2 Gate.  NO PROBLEM.  Just put it onto the source rail directly â€" in front of or after the CSR.  IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE TO THE RESULTS â€" Just marginal variations at BEST.

Regards,
Rosemary

[poynt99]

Yes, all too well. But what you may have missed here is it is all right if you post one circuit and talk about another, I'm supposed to understand. Yet if Rosemary where to post similarly, then it is the end of the world.

Ron

Noted. I will try to do better in the future.

However, you DID understand, and I suspect most everyone did also. I think you made a mountain from a molehill, and really didn't establish the point you had intended.

Now, if you would see fit to afford Rose the same scrutiny you just did to my post, it might help move this topic in a forward direction.

.99

[vonwolf]

. I think you made a mountain from a molehill
.99

    Coming from you that's rich.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Well Poynty Point.  I’m not sure that anyone’s holding a knife to your throat.  If you don’t like me and you don’t approve of this technology â€" then there’s a simple solution.  Just go away.  I believe you’ve got your own forum where you and your cronies can rabbit on about the stupidity of over unity claims - for as long as like.  And then you can bore yourselves to tears and feel very superior while you’re at it.

For some reason there’s an ardent over commitment to protect us from our own interests.  And I think that the most members on this forum can tolerate the fact that I am an amateur because the most of them are only really interested in the facts of this experiment.  And while I’m an amateur â€" those who have assisted me in this development  â€" most certainly are not.  And even as an amateur it seems that I have MUCH to teach you.   Let me remind you about your undersampling claims, among many other rather deliberate obfuscations.

Just go away Poynty Point.  And leave us all with our freedoms to decide what we want to discuss â€" or not.  It seems that the only people dedicated to stopping this discussion is you and Pickle.  Others who don’t care enough just don’t bother to ‘dip in’ here.  That’s how it should be any democratic forum.  Unless of course, you’re trying to turn this into a tyranny â€" where only you have a voice.  Where only your opinion matters.  Unless you’re trying to derail this thread because you JUST really need to keep a lid on things.

I would have thought â€" in general â€" that if this is all nonsense â€" then it will all just ‘die a natural death’.  Truth, on the other hand, seems to survive all kinds of attack.  So.  Let the story unfold â€" as indeed it will.  Just stop trying to tell us what that truth is.  You clearly ignore even the truth of your own simulation results.  I’m not sure that you’re equal to this particular truth.  So.  Just exercise your own democratic freedoms of choice and GO AWAY.  It’s simple.

Rosie.