Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[poynt99]

Ron,

You seem like a fairly level-headed individual, and since you are active in this thread and seem to understand Rose, I have a sincere request:

Could I impose on you to provide a synopsis for the above "answer" Rose offered to my question?

Much appreciated,
.99

[powercat]

Talk about "nuspeak" The ones who made the pole, with their own preconceived ideas, are the ones who will vote in the poll. Ergo, the pole will be close to 100% in favor of disbelief... amazing!

Ron

Rosie is one that is claiming OU for the last two years.
I feel I have now seen more than enough to form my own conclusion (it doesn't work as claimed)
It is indeed very interesting research but Rosie is claiming OU not me
so can you Ron substantiate that claim of OU, if you can you have done something that other members like Woopy, Gotoluc, TinselKoala  have missed in the last two years.

Good luck with this one Ron, you persevered with Thane Heins maybe you'll get lucky with Rosie

Rosie's work is very interesting and I'm learning a lot but that aside, claiming OU for the last two years 

[woopy]

hi all

So far ,my small intelligence is able to think that , when people are not interested  in a subject , normally they leave it, and the sayd subject desapears from itself
.
very simple isn'it ?

But in the Rose's  subject not only it does not desapears , but the subject seems so important that it requires a POLL , to see if the members of this forum apreciate or not the discussion or the proposed and defended object. DU GENRE "good or not good "

We are going to court here. OOUUUPSS !!! I did not know that a forum could go so far !!   Simply ridiculous at my eyes sorry !!

Another time this circuit seems not so difficult or too expensive to replicate for such elevated and educated people as you P.99 and others here
.
Why don't you test it in real life ? so everything would be OK .

So we could be clear if  the circuit is in accordance with what Rose claims , or not and BASTA !

good luck at all

Laurent


Wow Rose your work is really interesting and provoque a huge interest

[poynt99]

I am indeed trying to establish what the circuit connections are so I and others can build it.

An appeal to all;

Does this circuit diagram accurately depict Rose's "new" circuit connections?

.99

PS. As shown, I was not able to get the circuit to oscillate in the simulation.

[poynt99]

SO.  Here’s how it’s ALWAYS configured AND NOT AS IT WAS CONFIGURED FOR THE DEMO.

Q1 GATE to Q2 SOURCE
Q1 DRAIN to Q2 DRAIN
Q1 SOURCE to Q2 GATE.

Functions Generator INPUT to Q1 GATE
Functions Generator GROUND to Q2 GATE.

THAT’s how it’s configured. And that’s how it needs to be configured.  HOWEVER â€" if you â€" for any reason CANNOT put the ground directly onto Q2 Gate.  NO PROBLEM.  Just put it onto the source rail directly â€" in front of or after the CSR.  IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE TO THE RESULTS â€" Just marginal variations at BEST.

Regards,
Rosemary

Can anyone make any sense of that last part?

Here is my own precarious take on it:

Just put it onto the source rail directly

By "source", does Rose mean battery ground, or the Source pin of one of the MOSFETs?

If my above diagram is correct, then placing the FG ground lead on either end of the CSR is a very different connection than placing it on the Q2 Gate.

I am open to any corrections.

Thanks,
.99