Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

poynt99 · May 13, 2011, 02:17:34 PM

Rose,

It seems to read as if the CSR is connected properly and scoped properly, but until I see an actual fully-updated schematic (not a description of connections which can be misinterpreted) along with the simulation wave forms and measurements thereof, I am not ready to accept that you have a net negative voltage across the CSR. Why can Donny not post his sim results here?

.99

poynt99 · May 13, 2011, 02:36:30 PM

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on May 12, 2011, 03:01:05 PM
Poynty - OUR RESULTS - as shown. OUR CLAIM related to the results - as shown. The circuit excluded the eccentric MOSFET config. The Ground of the functions generator - which I KNOW is what you're asking - IS AS SHOWN.

The water to boil test - we PUT THE FG's GROUND as I explained earlier.

Regards
Rosie

I surmise then from your response, that you will not commit to a "yes" or "no" answer to that question.

.99

Rosemary Ainslie · May 13, 2011, 02:49:33 PM

Quote from: poynt99 on May 13, 2011, 02:36:30 PM
I surmise then from your response, that you will not commit to a "yes" or "no" answer to that question.

.99

LOL. I have NO idea how to answer it more fully. But nice to see you're happy with the positioning of the CSR and sundry. I'm going to redo this test when I've got my PC back so that I can video - at least ten minutes - of the 'water to boil' number. I plan to 'knock your socks off'. lol

And Poynty, Donny works 18 hours a day - earning a living. He hardly has time to sleep. You don't get idle when you've got that much talent. And frankly none of the team care to work on forum as I do. And I only do this because I appreciate the value of all that negative comment. You have no idea how valuable the dialogue is. The more negative the better. When people line up on two or more sides of an argument then they're also asking questions. And it's those questions that matter most. To me anyway.

So. If that 'layout' is right - and since everyone is calling for it - and since I cannot draw it - then Poynty Point? Perhaps if you have a spare minute or two - perhaps you could oblige us all? It would be MOST appreciated.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

neptune · May 13, 2011, 03:05:56 PM

Hi Rosemary . I understand you are going to repeat the water boiling test . Last time , you expressed surprise that the water reached 100 degrees Celsius without appearing to boil . I have come across this before , in my international truck driving days . We use a 12 volt immersion heater [120 watts] which you put in your tea or coffee cup . The water never boiled like it would in a pan on a stove , it just steamed and you could see tiny bubbles rising . Apparently you need a lot of power to promote vigorous boiling .

Rosemary Ainslie · May 13, 2011, 03:10:29 PM

Quote from: neptune on May 13, 2011, 03:05:56 PM
Hi Rosemary . I understand you are going to repeat the water boiling test . Last time , you expressed surprise that the water reached 100 degrees Celsius without appearing to boil . I have come across this before , in my international truck driving days . We use a 12 volt immersion heater [120 watts] which you put in your tea or coffee cup . The water never boiled like it would in a pan on a stove , it just steamed and you could see tiny bubbles rising . Apparently you need a lot of power to promote vigorous boiling .

Quite possibly Neptune. But the lack of noise I think was the result of the vacuum flask - and we're at sea level. Not sure how that effects the 'boil' temperature. It's a question that I'll leave for the boffins here.

Take care Neptune.
Kindest regards,
Rosie