Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[poynt99]

  If this takes place Rose I guess I'm out of it because I was banned at OUR too bad I guess all I'll be able to do is read unless poynt99 reinstates me don't be in too much of a hurry to lock this thread
    Good Luck Pete

Pete,

Check your PM; you're re-registered.

.99

PS. Glen has assured me that should he post, he is going to keep things strictly technical.

[vonwolf]

Pete,

Check your PM; you're re-registered.

.99

   Thanks poynt99

[Rosemary Ainslie]

  If this takes place Rose I guess I'm out of it because I was banned at OUR too bad I guess all I'll be able to do is read unless poynt99 reinstates me don't be in too much of a hurry to lock this thread
    Good Luck Pete

Petes - I'd forgotten this.  It would have to be a required condition that we're both reinstated.  I assure you that I would not post there otherwise.  And don't worry which forum this is advanced on.  They're all much of a muchness.  Each forum owner tries to select which technology is closest to their particular interest - and then they plug it.  And ours - thank God - is entirely refuted just about everywhere except by the readers here.  It's really a bit of a joke.  Science determined by preference.  I sincerely believe that all engineers have their own preferred 'beliefs' related to the thinking behind any technology.  It will be wonderful when they finally realise that science and it's models are either right or they're wrong.  Which also means that my own eccentric thesis may be found to be very badly flawed.  Frankly - thus far I think its on the money.  But only time will tell.  lol.

Take care Petes.  If we move across it's understood that my very few friends - including you - also be allowed a voice.  Golly.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

 

[vonwolf]

Petes - I'd forgotten this.  It would have to be a required condition that we're both reinstated.  I assure you that I would not post there otherwise.  And don't worry which forum this is advanced on.  They're all much of a muchness.  Each forum owner tries to select which technology is closest to their particular interest - and then they plug it.  And ours - thank God - is entirely refuted just about everywhere except by the readers here.  It's really a bit of a joke.  Science determined by preference.  I sincerely believe that all engineers have their own preferred 'beliefs' related to the thinking behind any technology.  It will be wonderful when they finally realise that science and it's models are either right or they're wrong.  Which also means that my own eccentric thesis may be found to be very badly flawed.  Frankly - thus far I think its on the money.  But only time will tell.  lol.

Take care Petes.  If we move across it's understood that my very few friends - including you - also be allowed a voice.  Golly.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

 

   Thanks Rose, poynt99 and I have reconciled so all is well lets just try to keep moving forward
  Pete

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rose,

As I've mentioned, I think this discussion should be in an open forum, and since OU is the one that seems to hold the most support for your work, I prefer that it remain here. I have contacted Glen in hopes he will allow the space required here to discuss the issues at hand. I have a feeling he will capitulate.

.99

Is this a joke?  What support?  Your's or Glen's.  There is only 1 entirely outstanding feature of this work of ours and that is that is has ABSOLUTELY NO SUPPORT ANYWHERE.  That's the joke.  It's the ONLY technology that is repeatedly able to breach every barrier required by mainstream physics.  It is the only technology that was required to predict a thesis.  And it is also the ONLY technology that is entirely discounted. AND it's the only technolgy that is correctly and accurately measured.  And the real joke is that its rejection is NOT based on the science - but on my involvement with that science.  LOL.   

I'm very happy to debate things Poynty.   But DO NOT try and give me any assurances related to Glen.  The only way this would be managed is on your own forum.  And I say this because I'm inclined to trust to your new intentions here to get to the bottom of things.  Which means you'll moderate.  Actively.  Glen, however, is entirely incapable of contributing to any debate on this subject.  He cannot even find his way around the math function on a Tektronix TDS3054C.  And the only comments he can make is to copy and paste.  He is incapable of anything else.  He can hardly manage a structured sentence.  But what he can do is distract and interrupt by an excessive display of these his only talents - that and a REALLY good build on COPIED technologies.

Regards,
Rosemary

Added

and added again.
I'm happy to debate things here Poynty.  But I need some far better assurance that Glen STAYS OUT OF THIS THREAD.