Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[MrMag]

rose,
If this is an "Entirely different circuit with even better results", the battery test you keep referring must have been done on the old circuit. Can you do the circuit performance test that I (and others) requested on this new and improved circuit. It won't cost any money as you already have all that is needed. You do not need to monitor it continuously, just check it every so often to make sure it is still running. You don't need it to be hooked up to a scope or anything. Just take a battery measurement before you start and after a couple of months you can take another battery reading. It's really very simple to do.

Your argument that this has been done before is wrong. This test has never been done. You may have run different tests over time but not one continuous test and not with this new circuit.

[powercat]

And yet again you fail to read the evidence.  Here's that link again.  If this does NOT constitute a replication then BY RIGHTS it needs must be withdrawn.  As of NOW it is NOT withdrawn.  This is published by Fuzzy on his own Scribd file.  EXPLAIN THAT if you can.  To the best of my knowledge Fuzzy is a forum member.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/23455916/Open-Source-Evaluation-of-Power-Transients-Generated-

Rosie is never wrong about anything . For a start I can't decide which of  Fuzzy's is Previous post to quote they all make the point that you got nothing,and you think he's got OU from your circuit 

I don't want you to leave the forum I want you to interact properly with the members here and do your very best to comply with their requests and prove you really have something, unfortunately all you are probably going to do is repeat the same old thing,  argue with everyone, and say it's a conspiracy.


Quote from: fuzzytomcat on May 19, 2011, 07:11:18 PM
Rosemary any credibility you had left is "GONE" especially after your posting of the pure nonsense "REPORT".

NO ONE HERE AT OVER UNITY cares about your pathetic thesis .... This thread is called Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011 for a reason none of which you have ever understood titles of threads at http://www.energeticforum.com/ .... http://www.overunityresearch.com/ ..... http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/ ..... http://www.thenakedscientists.com/ ( aka witsend , aetherevarising ) where you were banned for continued false and inaccurate statements and attacking members.   

I invite and challenge everyone readers and guests to look at the 8,000 postings of Rosemary's spread out over several years at these forums and see for yourself.

This thread here at OU.com was to show evidence of a finding on a claim of "YOURS" on efficiency of a experimental device "YOU" claim to have a COP> INFINITY.

You have not shown in any "SCIENTIFIC METHOD" how to obtain this efficiency in any way shape or form a experimental device "YOU" claim to have a COP> INFINITY and have "FAILED" miserably only a grade or high school electronic class will be interested in your claim.

You ( Rosemary ) cannot supply one credible package of one experiment that includes a circuit diagram with oscilloscope screen shots done during the test not even one to verify your claim of a finding.

The REPORT failed .... nothing for a independent experimentalist to take and to make a device to your specifications for testing and evaluation in a scientific method to verify the claim on a finding of COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY ....

There is nothing in this thread of value you are a terrible inventor and experimentalist and my credentials and expertise stand on there own and well documented unlike yours ..... this is what documentation looks like .... FYI
http://www.energeticforum.com/inductive-resistor/5359-mosfet-heating-circuits.html  ( nine pages !!!! )
http://cid-6b7817c40bb20460.office.live.com/browse.aspx/.Public/Mosfet%20Heater

I won't be so nice to ask you a "TENTH" time here in this thread to do the testing in a scientific method required and do it correctly, not half ass or less as you have shown or are you incapable of the request.

Facts only Facts can you do that ? Are you capable Rosemary ? Do you need someone to hold your hand ?   


Fuzzy

[WilbyInebriated]

@powercat:

The Ainslie circuits - I spent thousands of hours on countless experiments on all kinds of variations with that and Glen did even more. We were NOT given all the information in the beginning and that was a complete farce.
However the circuit does have merit. I got cop 2.0 as a fairly standard result - but of course the skeptics will blame it on the peukert effect or
something. But the peukert effect in the battery on a low draw does NOT explain the same heat for less measurable energy going in.
Glen got better I believe. But the most interesting to me is that while the timer circuit was dissipating energy (warming up), with my own mods, that I disclosed 100%, the mosfet and resistor side of the circuit cooled up to 2 degrees Celsius below the ambient temperature of the room, which is a different thing altogether and is serious reverse entropy.
Anyway, both Glen and I did replicate over 1.0 with a lot of data to back
it - we didn't come close to cop 17.0 like Ainslie claimed but over 1.0 is over 1.0.

(emphasis added by me)

quote taken from http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/8247-tom-bearden-oil-3.html#post142994

"The gifted and skilled Open Source Researcher, Internet name Fuzzytomcat” (Glen Lettenmaier), one of the first to Replicate the Ainslie Circuit successfully in 2009, has built several configurations of the special inductors/resistors for test… And his fine work in building, tuning, measuring, documenting, and analyzing test results… Extremely well recorded and presented using the Tektronix Digital Phosper Oscilloscope stored data, still photos, and “You Tube” videos… Conclusivly prove using accepted industry-standard methods that this circuit has definite anamalous qualities in energy efficiency, and that the Rosemary Ainslie Circuit and effect deserves very close scrutiny from our scientific mainstream community."

(emphasis added by me)

quote taken from "the strange case of the rosemary ainslie circuit by steve windisch". full text can be found here: http://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/2009/12/24/the-strange-case-of-the-rosemary-ainslie-circuit-by-steve-windisch/

[powercat]

@powercat:
(emphasis added by me)

quote taken from http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/8247-tom-bearden-oil-3.html#post142994


(emphasis added by me)

quote taken from "the strange case of the rosemary ainslie circuit by steve windisch". full text can be found here: http://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/2009/12/24/the-strange-case-of-the-rosemary-ainslie-circuit-by-steve-windisch/

It is what is happening on this forum that interests me.
Your first link,
Having looked through the whole thread on that other forum, what a surprise an argument about how you are measuring things  and a request for it to be made a self-sustaining 

As for the other two year old link you posted, Fuzzy as more than covered this subject in this thread and the other thread, maybe I should repost more of his quotes.

Again nobody on this forum has been able to match those claims of OU.

You appear to support Rosie's claims, but you do nothing to help solve the problem that no one here can match those results, and I have already pointed this out to you in my previous posts.

Have you and Rosie ever thought of a political career, your great at avoiding the reality of the situation in front of you, by diverging the argument and ignoring reasonable requests.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Wilby - thanks for trying to stem this rot.  But it really isn't needed.  Just let them rabbit on.  It does no harm and hopefully it'll take the attention off this thread until we're ready to publish.  And if we never do publish - then so what?  It just means that we'll inevitably be looking at an escalating energy crisis that will put paid to our social comforts.  And then perhaps the evidence will start speaking more loudly.  Because right now these horrors are hell bent on denying it.  And the joke is that neither of them can even manage elementary power analysis.  So it's not as if we can have a decent discussion. 

Just let it go.  It really isn't worth the effort.  They haven't got the wherewithal to know what they're doing.  And I'm not sure that I can blame them for that.  It just is what it is. 

Regards,
Rosemary