Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[Rosemary Ainslie]

You argue my case very well MaNag.   I've known parrots with a wider repertoire.  And your identity confusions are now getting catastrophic.  Magsy is Magluvin's nick name.  He's the best example of our forum members.  I don't think any of us would mind you trying to borrow his identity.  But then try and act like him.  That would help us all.

And MaNag - I'm OLD.  I'm not UGLY.  I am not a HAG.  Not yet anyway.  I'm still well able to turn the occasional head.  LOL.

Rosemary

ADDED
Btw I took the trouble to revisit that first post of yours.  If that's an example of fair minded reasonableness - then clearly we are reading different posts.
R

[MrMag]

You argue my case very well MaNag.   I've known parrots with a wider repertoire.  And your identity confusions are now getting catastrophic.  Magsy is Magluvin's nick name.  He's the best example of our forum members.  I don't think any of us would mind you trying to borrow his identity.  But then try and act like him.  That would help us all.

And MaNag - I'm OLD.  I'm not UGLY.  I am not a HAG.  Not yet anyway.  I'm still well able to turn the occasional head.  LOL.

Rosemary

Golly rosy,
You call me so many different things that I was sure that you were talking to me. But that's ok, I'll take it as an apology from you anyways.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Golly rosy,
You call me so many different things that I was sure that you were talking to me. But that's ok, I'll take it as an apology from you anyways.

You're welcome Nag.  The more so if it'll encourage you to simply go away.

Rosie

[powercat]

Another HALF TRUTH.  Indeed.  No-one on this forum has produced OU with our circuit.  TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE NO-ONE ON THIS FORUM HAS TRIED TO REPLICATE OUR CIRCUIT. 
I AM NOT CLAIMING AN OVER UNITY RESULT.  What we're CLAIMING is INFINITE COP. 
Rosemary

Here are few videos for members on the forum, they are other members that didn't make videos who also failed in their attempts to match your claim of OU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrwgEb5ac_w
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZM8BBa7_Zpc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4x0wQJrc9To
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-GBS3sKcB8g
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trip8gjoxMQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpaP__5Kd38

If you don't want to call it OU that's fine we will call it excess energy, hopefully that will stop another pointless argument argument, however you want to dress it up and twist everything the fact remains that despite many people trying to reproduce your circuit none of them can match your results, and you do nothing to help them, and if they question why it is not working you generally attacked them, you keep coming up with arguments that have already been covered in previous posts, there is not one person on this forum who believes your circuit will produce any excess energy, and that is why your supporters can't make the circuit.

you have a good political way of getting your message across, but when most people look at the reality of the history of your circuit on this forum and you're refusal to do any new test.
it is clear to most of them that you are just using this forum for grandstanding and publicity.

[powercat]

MrMag has been very helpful to me on this forum in sharing his knowledge.  He was especially helpful in my obtaining an O'scope from ebay a while back.  I have been supportive of Rose as well.  I calls them likes I sees them.

Bill

Hi Bill

The main problem here is that Rosie keeps insisting that her circuit produces excess energy, many members on this forum replicated that circuit failed to get any excess energy, if they complain about the circuit not working properly Rosie generally attacks them.

If you are going to claim excess energy on this forum you are expected to interact with reasonable requests for new tests, I think that it's only reasonable when making such claims.

there are plenty of people out there claiming they have got a free energy circuit if we invited them all on here, and told them that they didn't have to interact with anyone who made requests for them to prove their case, this forum would lose all credibility.

Yes Rosie's work is very interesting and can be considered good research material,are but her attitude to members here that make reasonable requests or suggest that her circuit might not work,is appalling.