FREE ENERGY AC GENERATOR ?

Omnibus · March 19, 2011, 11:30:29 AM

This is where I'm measuring I and V. Voltage is w/ 10V offset while current is on the order of kiloamps. Do you measure the same thing?

teslaalset · March 19, 2011, 11:31:47 AM

Quote from: Omnibus on March 19, 2011, 10:52:25 AM
It isn't clear at all what's going on. Now, there should be some initial input and then it should be taken away. How's that accomplished in the sim? Then, I'm getting some huge amp values. Why? Also, 1/50Hz should give 0.02s as one period, not 0.01s, or I'm missing something.

Ok, you may have missed something.
The start situation is a charged capacitor (the left one).
This one is charged to +12V in the initial phase.
Then simulation starts and capacitor charge starts the oscillation.

In my simulation, I monitor the voltage across the resistor of 9KOhm

Omnibus · March 19, 2011, 11:37:33 AM

Quote from: teslaalset on March 19, 2011, 11:31:47 AM
Ok, you may have missed something.
The start situation is a charged capacitor (the left one).
This one is charged to +12V in the initial phase.
Then simulation starts and capacitor charge starts the oscillation.

OK, that's good but when placing 12V next to the cap doesn't the program take it that it remains 12V throughout and there's no discharge? Shouldn't this 12V be just at the first moment and then see what happens. Something like that. I thought there should be some bouncing back and forth between the caps. That's regarding the principle of operation of the sim itself. Also, I'm still unclear about the measured parameters. Current is excruciatingly high, for instance.

Omnibus · March 19, 2011, 12:01:58 PM

The greatest problem is the value of the parameters. Obviously the probram takes these 12V to be the initial condition and then the discharge goes along its natural way. So, that part may be considered settled. However, why is this enormous current popping up? This is the first thing I'd like to understand now.

Omnibus · March 19, 2011, 12:47:00 PM

@teslaalset,

Take a look at this graph. Damping of I and V signals is evident and is as expected due to losses (non-physical values of the current notwithstanding). One would say that precludes any hope for this device being OU, at least self-sustaining OU (unless someone who wants to hold us hostage insists he knows some secret set of parameters that sustain the signal; we won't fall in such trap, though). One lase hope for this device to be OU if it can be shown that the initial energy needed to charge the cap to 12V is less than the energy dissipated across the resistor till the signals die.