The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8

[Magluvin]

OK, sorry but did you read my previous post (About Tesla/Gabriel Device analogy) ? Why Tesla did not mention FE (What about, when he said: "a constant current at all load" ) generally in trafo when you put a load the current is not the same, no ?

Why we don't use it now, energy suppression, ask this at Rockefeller or Rotschild family LOL, try to sell your device in the market and tell me what the news after... (Have you hear about RomeroUK/Muller replication) he have posted a video and some info, after this he has literally disappeared...)

Tesla did not mention FE principle clearly, why ? Try to put a patent mentioning, overunity, free energy or perpetual motion, tell me the news after...

Sorry but for me, these two devices are two clone, adding some nanoperm core don't add some new "tech".
What I see: A primary, a shield, a secondary, an inner core... Phase difference and constant current at all load (FE) by proportioning different element like Tesla said, this what you have done, thank you for rediscovering this and your brillant work, but something new, I'am skeptic here...

Finally it's a good thing this technology is public domain, so no patent, no monopol and no suppression, and no money game again...

And the formulas stuff your device use some main stream science "effect", so formula can be an help, I hope I don't teach you something here, but you must use toaster ? Because you have not the correct ampere turns in your primary the whole device is saturated, and the voltage will be very low at the primary side (See ohm law... yeah again a "law"), I proposed to replace the toaster by a AC line reactor to avoid wasting energy (I suppose you know reactive load not consume energy... and it exist a formula again to determine the correct inductance value...) in the toaster, no one was responding about this...

So for now I think this is better to make my own research alone...

Regards,
Schubert.

It seems odd to me that we couldnt build it to match direct wall currents.   And I see many ideas.  Maybe 2 devices with their primaries in series?

It still boils down to design to me. This is why I am choosing to change the geometry of the core, cuz I know I will have to wind and rewind again and again. 

Anyway, we are all free to try. Im going to work with smaller devices. Power in and out is what its all about.


Im going to look at some premade rod cores for the central core first and epoxy core for shell and caps.

Mags

[Magluvin]

Also  there are many articles and interviews with Tesla that incline that tesla was all about free energy and claimed he had it.

Lets just say that he was very particular with the wording of his patents. ;] Most back then probably could not comprehend these ideas in his patents, let alone today. But some do.  He was a tiny bit cryptic, but wanted to protect the idea some how. And if we read close enough with a bit of imagination, there is a lot of good info there. ;]

Mags

[friendenergy]

@Mag I like the rod/ enclosed pipe idea you have. If you can get the right materials I think that would be an easier prototype and remod if you need too.

Well, if a patent is given then good and I wish the best for the inventor. I actually think I would be tempted too if I came up with an idea that was worthy. But honestly I don't think a patent for free energy device will be given. I think once free energy is open source then I do think it will be possible to patent anti-gravity, force fields, cloaking type stuff cause the cat will be out of the bag so to speak. Any way I am thankful for the info that has been shared thus far, didn't mean to get pissy...lol.

[SchubertReijiMaigo]

Anyway, we are all free to try. Im going to work with smaller devices. Power in and out is what its all about.

Yeah, I'm taking this direction also, to reduce power match the ampere turns Frequency/voltage and excite it like a normal transformer to see what happen.

Unfortunately nothing before several week, I have found a donut but these things are sold the two half glued together, and the bad thing I have no idea how separate them...

Also  there are many articles and interviews with Tesla that incline that Tesla was all about free energy and claimed he had it.

Lets just say that he was very particular with the wording of his patents. ;] Most back then probably could not comprehend these ideas in his patents, let alone today. But some do.  He was a tiny bit cryptic, but wanted to protect the idea some how. And if we read close enough with a bit of imagination, there is a lot of good info there. ;]

+1 I have already read some patent, even today certain concept and words to describe his stuff are kinda weird, some "legend" tell that Tesla invented this not for his time but for it's "children's time" into the future, 100 years after (our today time...), I'm not turning Tesla into some God or anything but just saying this guy is not common anymore...

[casman1969]

Mav,

Thanks for the response and won't press as I completely understand and would expect anyone here to do the same. It's encouraging to read your post and will catch up when I return next week. Hope you can get that Pat. App. in and approved before too long. We both know how long that takes but the mere fact you're going that route speaks volumes. I do hope congrats are in order.
Just one generic question...
Are you satisfied with the results of testing on the original specs.? I ask to make sure I'm pursuing the same line.