Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8

Started by Feynman, March 22, 2011, 04:07:09 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 25 Guests are viewing this topic.

SchubertReijiMaigo

Thanks for pics, this design look promising also, another Thane variant !!! I will save those pics for further experiment and backup data, after Tesla/Gabriel device experiment...
@ Jack: the input power is on the center leg right ? And you use high perm for the secondary circuit or the same for both ?

Jack Noskills

Thanks broli, that is much better picture.

Magnetec has oval shape cores, by connecting two ovals in the middle, then a suitable nano/magneperm core on top of that (or both sides) would be equivalent to this. A hamburger.

Only difference to my crude prototype would be that those ovals would not touch each other in the middle because of protective casing. This might make things different, but theres always a grinder if cores must touch. If I had 200-300 Eur to spare I would certainly try this out, multistrand square Litz wire to ease winding, maybe 5*5, connecting individual strands to get only one strand active...


Jack Noskills

Schubert, input is the center leg. My prototype was iron so I would quess that works even if permeability is the same for both cores. But my bet is that higher permeability second core would be much better.

penno64

Hi Jack,

I have been waiting so long to have a go at this one.

Having read and read then re-read again your post, if I understand correctly, the three primary
coils are from identical transformers.

In Broli's 3D, he shows the centre coil mounted sideways. Would this be correct?

I have a good feeling about this and can't help but see a link to LOCKRIDGE.

I have several MOTs that I have taken the coils out from and kept the laminations. Will attemp
to put this together.

Kindest Regards, Penno

broli

Quote from: penno64 on August 08, 2011, 07:44:15 AM

In Broli's 3D, he shows the centre coil mounted sideways. Would this be correct?

If you're talking about the crappy paint illustration I made then no that's not correct, I just made it to demonstrate a point, and I also just removed it to prevent further confusion. The 3d rendition is the correct one.