Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

Started by mrwayne, April 10, 2011, 04:07:24 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 75 Guests are viewing this topic.

ResinRat2



This system is really similar to what you guys are doing in this thread:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=oV5wFTfsTSs


It seems to be using the same principles.

Research is the only place in a company where you can continually have failures and still keep your job.

I knew immediately that was where I belonged.

neptune

@Mr Wayne. I asked exactly what your motivation was , and you came up with an answer that seems OK to me. There are members who have been on this website for many years, and I am one of them . We see ideas come and go. We see measurement mistakes. And unfortunately we see scams and deliberate fraud . I find it impossible to understand these fraudsters, because they gain nothing and loose respect. But their worst crime is that they divert research resources away from worthwhile projects . We all remember Trawoegers pyramid , Mylowes motor, and the Muller dynamo . Between them they cost me £1,000 I could not afford to loose .
       So why am I still here? because I still believe in the strong possibility of Free Energy and Overunity . I am just a lot more wary than I once was. From the info available to me , I believe that you have discovered something real. Replication is the way forward, and for that we are going to need a LOT of help from you,[who else can we ask .]
        You know what you know as a result of hard work and experiment. The road from the simple Travis Effect demonstration to what you have now, must have been a long and expensive journey. So I need to ask you a very simple question, and I am almost sure you know the answer . Here is my question.


Suppose we have a simple inverted cup , sitting over a Travis block, with no air in it, so it is completely full of water. Then we pump a small amount of air into it , and allow it to lift a weight .So is the energy needed to pump that air , smaller than the "output energy" , of lifting the weight . Hope fully , you can give us a yes, no , or don`t know answer.
@Mondrasek, you are a star. Brilliant diagrams . That is exactly the kind of thing we need.

Lakes

Quote from: ResinRat2 on June 10, 2012, 11:15:10 AM

This system is really similar to what you guys are doing in this thread:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=oV5wFTfsTSs


It seems to be using the same principles.
Yup, thats the animation I was referring to in my previous post.

mondrasek

Quote from: ResinRat2 on June 10, 2012, 11:15:10 AM
This system is really similar to what you guys are doing in this thread:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=oV5wFTfsTSs
It seems to be using the same principles.

How is it similar and what same principles is it using?  The only similarity I can see is that it uses a fluid.

Don't want to come off being rude.  Please explain what I must be missing?

M.