Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

[LarryC]

@All,

With much assist from Wayne, please consider the following:

The Travis effect device has four principles working at once to achieve over unity. If you look at just one principle, you will not be able to understand.

(1) The Nonlinear effect due to air compression/expansion requires less weight to make more pressure on the down stroke, and less pressure to make more lift on the up stroke.

(2)The Zed design is more efficient than a hydraulic cylinder as my previous calculations have shown. Partly due to the lack of friction robbing seals in the Zed as opposed to those in the hydraulic cylinder and mostly due to the increased surface area in the layered Zed. More layers, more efficiencies.

(3)The ZED system has production in both directions. First, on the up stroke, the buoyancy force is captured in a hydraulic fluid under pressure, some of which is used to move the water back and forth. Second, on the down stroke, the head production is captured and all of it is used to pay for most of the water transfer.
(Do not overlook the fact that the buoyancy captured, does not consume any of the head used to create the buoyancy)

(4) The inverted pumping system reduces 20% off the operating cost.

Regards, Larry

[iflewmyown]

Neptune said:

To all the people who have witnessed Wayne`s machine under NDA. I believe we now have three such witnesses who have posted here. Whilst I find your reports fascinating, it is noticeable to me [and to the naysayers] that you are all new members. Whilst not doubting your integrity, it would be valuable to know how you first heard about this technology. I am assuming that you heard about it elsewhere, and were probably directed here by Wayne and his team. Would any of you care to enlighten us please?


Username:iflewmyown
Posts:60 (0.042 per day)Age:N/ADate Registered:August 09, 2008, 06:44:26 AM

Have a nice day 

[jdsanders]

Could you do any conclusive measurements? Input versus output?

Is the machine working? If it is working, for how long does it run?

Greetings, Conrad

@conradelektro: No, my visit occurred the day AFTER they isolated the poppet valve leakage problem. During the visit, an engineer/technician was at the control panel working on the machine. I believe he was successively pressure-testing the different portions of the machine to check for additional leaks.  So, I did not witness the machine running, nor was I able to request or observe any meaningful measurements.   -Joel

[theotherguy]

To Neptune,

I learned of the ZED from PESN.com a few months ago, while checking out information on LENR, which I have only been seriously following since Rossi's announcement last Fall.  I'm only 3 hours from Chickasha and Wayne was very open to receive visitors.

Yes I am new to this forum.  The evening I got back from checking out the ZED I came across this forum from a link posted on a site discussing the Rossi's E-Cat.  Coincidence? Probably, but browsing the posts, I thought an eye witness post would be helpful.  Wayne Travis never asked anything of us. He barely even mentioned his detractors and I think only because someone brought it up.  Like I said, I didn't even know this site existed until after I visited with Wayne.

My background is Computer Science, Math, Physics & Chemistry.  I get the skepticism.  It shouldn't work, but it sure looks like it does.  I will probably spend the next few weeks playing with cups and lead weights in the sink.

Wayne Travis should be commended for his openness and willingness to share his discovery.

[Low-Q]

@Seamus101


It doesn't help to argue against believers - regardless of what they believe in (It doesn't have to be OU machines) ;-) I have tried. Believe me - it doesn't work... The only thing that works for changing peoples mind is a bullet, but it isn't allowed. The best thing is to look away, accept that other people thinks different, and have another view on things. Whish I had the patience to let people believe in what they want


However, being unconserned of the "impossible" (like many in here are - myself included) is important for learning, important for inventing something - even if the final product isn't what you first thought out. Maybe not OU, but at least something useful anyways. Remember that most of us, if not all, are still in our childhood in physics. We mostly do not see the whole picture, and cannot predict the real outcome other than what ones mind has made up - until one have had hands on experience with the invention. Then you scratch your head for a while, and ask yourself why it doesn't work as intended. Then learn something, and moves on 


Vidar