Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

Started by mrwayne, April 10, 2011, 04:07:24 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 125 Guests are viewing this topic.

neptune


Ghost

Quote from: MileHigh on July 22, 2012, 11:31:20 AM
The only thing of interest is to see how this story will end.  Will it take the form of one of the classic free energy exit strategies?  I am willing to bet that it will.
MileHigh
Correct, i wouldn't be surprised either.

@true open source people. 

Jesus fucking Christ! People must think we're re-fucking-tarted or something, my God!
This is why I have NO patience anymore. People don't know what OPEN SOURCE is and pretend it's all out in the open! When it's NOT!
And I have said this before and I'll say it again...You CAN NOT commercialize Free Energy/Over Unity (NO I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT WIND, SOLAR, ETC!), period. You may be able to patent it but not commercialize it. Look at Tesla, and many others who have tried to commercialize FEE ENERGY! THEY DID NOT GET VERY FAR!. What makes you think you'll bypass our current corrupt government to make it happen?! If the people get a hold of real true free energy devices/machines they will break loose from the government and that is something they DO NOT want people to have access to, because then they will lose control of us slaves. Oh wait you think the government is for the people by the people? lol not really, its for the private banks by the privates banks who enslaves us through debt, monopoly, energy, media, drugs, and agriculture! wake the fuck up people, Jesus!





LarryC

The two pictures show the water heights at 5 PSI and 8.4 PSI using the water height calculator with a "Out Ret Water Drop" value of 12 and 4.38. These were the latest PSI's stated by Wayne. In the 5 it is easy to see how the outer columns have moved much less than the inner. The percentages also change.

Regards, Larry

mrwayne

That is very good Larry,
You may notice that the outer layers - with less movement - account for the higher pressure for lower weight.
The outer layers have a larger diameter - and the last layer pushes against the atmosphere.
Wayne

fletcher

Quote from: mrwayne on July 22, 2012, 10:16:26 AM

To All, It is clear through all of our postings and answers to the questions regarding our system that we us Buoyancy In a very unique way to generate excess power - and that the system is self looped - requiring no input.

As I said before - I have allowed the skeptics and the validation teams to decide how they chose to measure the input and output.

It is elementary to understand that a system such as ours - that requires no input to produce work - "of any kind" requires proper and due dilligense before making claims of any sort. It has also been explained in regards to comparisons to other systems -  Mark Dansie - 99.9% of all claims of FE are - measurement error - poor theory, and a few scams. Mark has also said publically and on other forums repeatedly - this Oklahoma device is the .1% we have been looking for.

It is a waste of my time to tell you how good our system is - that is why I have helped others to discover for themself. You can get as complicated as you want - you can get even more sophisticated equipment - you can claim you see nothing - but you can not make the simple math go away.

The truth of the .1% success is right before your eyes - if you just are honerable enough to look. As I said to MH before - I will not waste my time with the dishonerable - do your home work.

I do not expect anyone to take my word for it - and I have been open and honest. All the claims to the contrary do not float like the Z.E.D.

P.s. I have asked nothing from any of you - I have offered to share. I am thankful for the sucess our team has had - and the now 13 replication (modeling) successes that have been reported to me.

Wayne Travis


Hi Wayne .. please tell me if I have this wrong & my apologies in advance if I have - I think you said your ZED's are pressurised ?

If so, what is the purpose of pressurising the system ?

Would it not work without pressurisation or does it only work this way ?

I assume, if it is so, that it helps to shunt water back & forth efficiently but you might be using a hydraulic pump for that ?

Sorry if I've missed relevant detail that answers this query that you've already given elsewhere - just trying to mind map the system accurately.