Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

[neptune]

@Tk. You ask the question "If someone were to take a single one of your Zeds at resting state, and inject 15 cubic inches of hydraulic fluid or water at 640 PSI , will you really get 30 cubic inches at 640 PSI back out."
        The fact that you asked this question demonstrates very clearly that you have not invested the effort to understand even the basics of this system.

1. Hydraulic fluid is never injected into a ZED, only water, and during set up, air.
2.Whatever is injected into a Zed, the input pressure
is in the region of 10 PSI max. Any more will result in blown skirts.
3.The only place in the system we find hydraulic fluid at 640 PSI , is in the transmission system between the ZEDs and the generator. The transmission uses conventional hydraulic components.
Please do your homework.

[mondrasek]

I just want to clarify what Wayne has said and has continued to do here on OU.com.  It is not to PROVE he has an OU device.  He knows he has one.  He has built it and can watch it run every day.  His plan for "proving" it to the world involved coming on this board over a year ago to ask for advise and assistance.  To that end he ended up in contact with Mark Dansie and has been working under his advisement to prepare for the testing required to "prove" his system.  It is Mark Dansie and his team that is to "prove" the system to the rest of us.

Wayne came here to OU to teach those who want to learn how his system works.  He has helped those who try to model and simulate a system every step of the way.  He is helping those individuals to prove it to themselves, even in advance of the "proof" from MD and team.

I appreciate those who want to see the "proof" of the OU of Wayne's actual machine(s).  I want that too.  But he has never said that is what he is here to do.  And barring some change of direction from Wayne, we all have been told to wait on MD for that.  If you want to pester someone for the proof, maybe you should pester MD?

But if you want to take Wayne up on his offer to learn how his set up works, to better understand the patent, or to build an analysis tool or even a device, please ask him any questions to that end.  He has so far answered with assistance on anything that is already public domain and even a bit more (when we have discovered more along the way).

Also, an opening statement like, "Sir, you are a liar,"  is just rude and bad form all around.  It is a classic example of what some individuals think is acceptable behavior while they are completely hidden behind the safety of the Internet.  If such "etiquette" were used in a face to face conversation, it would not be tolerated.  Especially when there is no evidence presented of any lie having been told by the accused?  So this is just name calling?

M.

[wildew]

Excellent use of the language @M !!
Amen

And Thank You Mr Wayne for doing all of the above.
Dale

[mrwayne]

Well, MrWayne, you sound a bit "tetchy" today.

I will look that word  up, but if it means tired of misdirection and misrepresentation - it is true.

It is in my weakness that I find strength - thank you for the concern.

At the end of the Day - We have the cure for the world's Energy needs, clean and reliable - we can deal with junk talk - it just sets my heart back a moment when the pearls are trampled upon - and then I realize - some will - the strength comes from the truth - it will prevail.

Wayne Travis

[mrwayne]

Sir, You are a Liar.
Seamus and Milehigh offered some very good arguments.
Just because they do not fit your overunity claim does not mean they are not contributing nor does it mean they are telling lies.
Untill you deliver undeniable proof that your invention works it does not matter who sais what because there is nothing to start with.

And encouraging people to use the report to moderator button because you feel someone is throwing non existent stink bag's at you just shows your weakness and that fact that you want to play out the good guy's against the bad guy's.
But for that to happen you are on the wrong board buddy.
You want our moderator to get rid of the skeptics well let me tell you this: it ain't gonna happen...
We are not here to attack anyone or to cause trouble, so stop acting like we do, we just want the truth and you know it.

You speak of the skeptics as being liars, but don't forget you still didn't supply any proof that your invention actually works and untill you do so, everybody is contributing, and nobody is telling lies.
You can put an end to this by proving your claim!

It seems you have a problem making up your own truth and you have a tendency to see criticism as being 'stink bags' while they are not.
It is just a means to an end which is the solution for both party's so once again:

IT'S UP TO YOU.

Please no more words just prove your claim.

@ ALL
Micro and his team have been trying to twist this conversation all year to deviate from the clear and stated purpose of my visit here.

It is up to me to stay on topic and on focus - to share our discovery and to explain the patent and to answer questions.
We have a team secured for the "Extraordinary proof" it is impossible to show that level of proof here - that is not our purpose.

As far as Micro's rant above:

It is a simple task to click on someone's name and read just their posts - the truth is presented - who is doing "what" is clear.
And as has been suggested by several members here -

When Micro, Seamus, MH try to twist our conversation from explaining our system into their own purpose with insults, slander, and disinformation - whatever that might be - use the moderator button.


Everytime they try to change the conversation and state that I have to prove something to them - such as O/U - they are not trying to learn - they are trying to redirect the conversation.
Thank You.

@Micro your insults to our discussions are cataloged - as I said before - you will owe us an apology, I hope you have the character when MD's Team is done.
I have called liars.... liars - and Skeptics..... Skeptics there is a big difference - throwing insults does not make you a Skeptic.

Splitting and dividing - it is you who have said repeatedly - "I am with you seamus" - followed by slander of the group actually contributing.

It will be a refreshing surprise, for your sake, I hope for you, and I pray you find the character.

Finally: I have stated my position - You will not lead this thread away from the topic - listen - do the due diligence - get your hands wet - add to the topic - or move on.

To those that have - Very well done indeed - and you are only on the surface "the tricycle stage" of what we have going on here - much more fun to come!

Wayne