Due to Thread Jacking=New Thread:Bessler Priciple Discovered

[christo4_99]

Wow.i have not visited this thread in a while.that was the nicest post i have ever seen.you are right,there is not much encouragement going around but there should be because so much is at stake.their seems to be some irrefutable evidence in the Bessler case.i have come a long way since i made this thread...seems like a long time ago.I pretty much destroyed my rep in one thread at the BW forum.i have dropped the movie idea and someone notable has advised me that there is nothing to be made in this.funny thing i actually thought it was something important.think it might help things?

[Airstriker]

Wow.i have not visited this thread in a while.that was the nicest post i have ever seen.you are right,there is not much encouragement going around but there should be because so much is at stake.their seems to be some irrefutable evidence in the Bessler case.i have come a long way since i made this thread...seems like a long time ago.I pretty much destroyed my rep in one thread at the BW forum.i have dropped the movie idea and someone notable has advised me that there is nothing to be made in this.funny thing i actually thought it was something important.think it might help things?

Your rep doesn't look to well here either. You have something to show or not? If you do, just show. If you don't want to show, don't expect any WOW, OH etc. and just sit quiet.

[sm0ky2]

There have been countless investigations, research studies, and documentaries done on Bessler's claims. The only thing that would "help" at this point, would be to replicate the technology, and create a working device.

There is far too much at stake to worry about things like  "reputation" and the refutation from critics.
If someone does indeed have a working device, they have a responsibility to all mankind to release that knowledge to the public, without concerns of personal gain.
There are commendable heros in this forum who habitually spend large portions of their hard-earned income, in persuit of our research, and disclose what they learn without ever asking anything in return.

Dont let a few nay-sayers stand in the way, and certainly dont keep your secrets for the sake of capitalistic greed. Such things will only perpetuate the problems we seek to resolve.

[christo4_99]

What do you all think?If there was a way to make most of the overall weight of the wheel,still in static balance to create an imbalance would it rotate?I am saying,i thought of a way to use balance,per se, to create imbalance.

[christo4_99]

Bessler's "problem" as i see it was getting the much deserved credit,love and admiration from his fellow man for being the gifted individual to solve the problem that nobody else had the mind to solve.It was a hard road to it possibly because the people who had tried to solve the problem before were so far off...but Bessler's message seemed to be that he liked getting his hands dirty,he didn't mind the work but since the world had treated him poorly maybe he should just let God give them this thing.If my concept is sound,and anyone will agree I hope,then I find myself in a similar position.I have been treated poorly at Besslerwheel.com and that's ironic to me because it seems like that's where they would want to listen.I have a lot in common with anyone seeking perpetual motion.Bessler placed a value so high on his achievement that he never sold it...and IMHO he actually felt under the circumstances it was best kept a secret.All these people with stature and ideas and influence but not the correct principle,hmm.And,since they have nothing they say that if they did they would gladly just give it away as if it was nothing.it is fair i think for me to assume that the world will not receive me kindly(as it hasn't already) either and that whatever information i have is better kept to myself.Bessler's thought was If your heart was full of love and your mind could truly believe it then you would surely find it.In that way it becomes safely hidden from the wrong people.Do you understand?