W.K.Coombs Open discussion thread

[bourne]

At this point, it is obvious that he doesn't have a working unit now or ever. He said he built one 2 years ago but has yet to show us even a picture. He doesn't have one that works as he said because he can't. It is impossible to have a working unit based on his concept.

Guys, I have been on this forum since 2007 and can safely say we have seen this countless times before.

Who recognises this mode of conduct...

Newish member states they have it,
says how easy it is when you 'Know',
provides very sketchy details, with vague descriptions and line drawings if at all,
starts ranting and sometimes being abusive to genuine questions,
causes multiple arguments between long-time members, for and against, feasible or not etc
says they are leaving the site...
Comes straight back with more ranting,
leave.

rinse and repeat ad infinitum.

It clearly is lots of fun for some people, if you are that way inclined.

Divide and conquer.

[ramset]

bourne
Yes we get a lot of dreamers,I must be honest ,I haven't seen many Scammers Post a "Name"! To me credibility goes up when there's no "hiding behind a handle".

  I like to think people today have better things to do than Mess with sincere men trying to leave this world a better place than they found it!

I hope Bill is not just "having fun"??

As always, Time will tell.

Chet

[e2matrix]

Ok I've been biting my tongue on this but besides sounding a lot like IST here's what I think.  I believe this statement from protech tells it all : "UNLESS YOU ARE BRIAN DEAD YOU CAN NOT USE THIS..........."
Firstly we'll assume the B-R-I-A-N is just a typo for BRAIN as there was no one called Brian in on this.  But look carefully at this rather oxymoronic statement from which you can logically infer that 'You must be brain dead to use this device.  It clearly states "you can not use this unless you are brain dead, i.e. stupid or worse".  Besides the obvious very insulting language I'm going to call this a Freudian slip on his part.  He let the cat out of the bag right there.  IMO Game Over.  If I'm wrong and he has something I'll apologize.  But I won't beg for tidbits of info from someone who is this egotistical and rude to everyone even if it was for a real PM device. 
 
   

[bourne]

Chet

I totally agree the name was unusual which is why I tried the anagram search a few pages back.

If there truly is suppression going on, then this is a very good place for divide and conquer tactics. Whether it is intentional or not, coordinated or not, think of the countless hours of quality thinking time wasted on figuring out if someone is an idiot or not.

I loose a lot of respect for people who call others idiots or the suchlike because they can't understand something presented to them. It never occurs to them to think their explanation might be at fault.

Peace

[bourne]

@E2M

I like the idea of it being IST far more than a sinister plot to disrupt our tinkering.



anagram of W K Coombs is 'bow mocks'

Brian something something mocks....who?