Overbalancing wheel

[AB Hammer]

Alan,
      ALL known energy IS produced by 'KNOWN'   so-called 'laws' ------ I'm quite sure we basicaly understand
these  'laws' --------- even if we don't agree with them.  I agree, we don't understand EVERTHING there is
to know about certain things, but I think we know enough to make calculated decisions.  It's quite possible
that we may 'stumble' upon a variation of these so-called laws, that may help us all in our quest for FREE-
ENERGY.


SPANG.               (BILL.)

Science is as we know today, but we have much to learn. The Laws of science have been used as absolutes. There is no absolutes, but only as we know them as of today. Being so called laws puts our knowledge in a box. To truly progress we have to think out of the box and unfortunately fright those who the box have closed their eyes. The largest lesson is to learn that we truly don't know much and a life is to learn to pass it on in hopes the next generations may have it better. So one day we won't be wiped out by a big rock but branch out into the universe, and survive as a species. 

Alan

[Low-Q]

What I have seen in most attempts (Those I understand) to build an overunity device, is that the inventor is using conventional, well established physics to reach their goal. How in the green forrest are these inventors able to make an overunity device by using already known physics (which denies that over unity is possible)?

Vidar

[AB Hammer]

What I have seen in most attempts (Those I understand) to build an overunity device, is that the inventor is using conventional, well established physics to reach their goal. How in the green forrest are these inventors able to make an overunity device by using already known physics (which denies that over unity is possible)?

Vidar

Simple logic Vidar

when a machine shows over unity using known devices. It is proof that physics is incomplete. LOL Then they will have to adjust there equations and we will advance even more. 

Alan

[SPANG]

To reply # 106
Vidar,
        My answer is simple -------------------- they've got it wrong!
And how many times have these 'laws' been 'adjusted ' to compensate for their incorrectness etc..?
Try reading what I said, in reply #105.



SPANG.                              (BILL.)

[SPANG]

Hi All,
       I just remembered a time (on another site), where I had 'posted' an idea, and received a reply from a
'disbeliever' ----- if you like, ----- who basicaly told me to dismantle my device, to 'prove' it could not work!
              I told him, to take himself into his back-yard, pull his bottom lip over his forehead, and suck!
I didn't hear from him again!




SPANG.                 (BILL.)