Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



PhysicsProf Steven E. Jones circuit shows 8x overunity ?

Started by JouleSeeker, May 19, 2011, 11:21:55 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

tagor

Quote from: JouleSeeker on July 27, 2013, 11:32:45 AM
Intriguing!  thanks for the links which I did visit.  Can you explain -- how is Moreau using hydrogen?  does his engine run on hydrogen?


what he was saying in 2005

http://quanthomme.free.fr/qhsuite/2005News/utopiatech.htm

and with his new site

http://www.utopiatechlab.com/data/documents/Technologie-H2-Utopiatech-Lab.pdf


http://www.utopiatechlab.com/data/documents/Recherche-LENR-Utopiatech-Lab.pdf


and also the boat mig675 is using H2 from the sea


JouleSeeker

Thanks, Tagor.  Next, is QuantHomme claiming COP>1 with his device?

Nice article on the Defkalion work by Jeanne Manning -
http://changingpower.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Defkalion-2-page-JM-Article-100-3.pdf

Thanks to Mike Nunnerley for calling this to my attention.

From the article:
Quote
"Defkalion's terminology makes sense;
instead of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions
(LENR), the company would prefer to say Heat
Energy from Nuclei Interactions (HENI)
. The
words "nuclear reaction" in LENR could raise
red flags in many countries' nuclear regulatory
agencies. Representatives of industries in 70
countries have contacted Defkalion about po-
tential licenses to manufacture Hyperion prod-
ucts in their home country."

I would take it a step further and say - anomalous heat from a non-chemical source -- and not pin it to "nuclei interactions" at all.  It may be that the heat is from a non-nuclear source as well! 

It was their insistence that the excess heat was due to "cold fusion" of deuterons that caused P&F such grief and resistance early on.  "Its too large to be chemical so it must be fusion" -- wrong!  And I think most would agree with me now that the heat was not due to d-d FUSION (I've been saying this for decades actually, and talked to Fleischmann about it). 

  Now I'm saying let us broaden our viewpoints even further -- the anomalous heat may be non-nuclear as well as non-chemical in origin!  And P&F join a long list of people who have observed NOT fusion but rather "freedom energy" aka "new energy" aka "unknown source of energy" - as seen by Dr Henry Moray -- and I think Peter Daysh Davey in light-water electrolysis cells in the 1940's -- and many others since then. 

     Now I may be wrong and it really is cold d-d fusion that P&F saw with their "excess heat", in which case they get the credit...  But if non-fusion and non-nuclear, then many others deserve pioneering credit for work in this field.  And there I would include Peter Daysh Davey and our own Michael Nunnerley (and numerous others).

  Why can't we leave it at "anomalous heat" and not try to constrain the field to one theory at this time?  Until we learn more about it?  I found many at the 18th International Conference on Cold Fusion having a hard time understanding what I was saying about this in my poster paper, however...  perhaps they did not want to stray so far from "cold fusion" notions.

  Bottom line:  Set the "theory" to one side for now; and focus on the empirical results and making the effect larger and useful to humankind!

tagor

Quote from: JouleSeeker on July 27, 2013, 02:14:52 PM
Thanks, Tagor.  Next, is QuantHomme claiming COP>1 with his device?



no , quanthomme has a lot of false claim !!


next his :

Quote

Ouverture du Site Commercial :  www.ohpranasystem.com [/b] (Prévision :  Septembre 2013 =>  Technologies OHPRANA et ETERNITY  ... )


woopy

Hi steven

I just made some experiments to test if there is some special magnetism arround my small plasma electrolyser

As you can see in the vidéo, i state that there is no noticeable effect with placing strong neo magnets arround the reactor. I mean no increase or decrease in the input/ output , so no difference with or without the permanent magnets arround the reactor.
But as you sugested, i tried to produce a changing magneting field .So  i placed a flat pancake coil (in serie with the rectified DC ) under or sided to  the reactor. I noticed nothing in the reactor efficiency , but than by "walking " a neo mag arround the coil and the reactor, i got the feeling in my finger that the vibration during the normal electrolysis was a "regular " vibration arround 50 Hz, and as soon as as i get the plasma electrolysis, the magnet transfer some brutal chocks in my fingers, no more regular vibrations but more unregular and strong chocks.

So i got the idea to put directly the magnet inside a more winded coil  , and the video shows the result

So i am thinking that the plasma reaction is pumping some energy from somewhere and transform it , not only in Heat and light to warm water,  but  alsp in RF in high voltage (perhaps usable )  spikes.

http://youtu.be/lIgRZCGISCY

So my ideas, what do you think

Laurent