PhysicsProf Steven E. Jones circuit shows 8x overunity ?

[tagor]

Merci, Tagor.  Prof. Biberian dit:
Oui, tres important.

yes , very important

Hi , prof do you know utopia tech and jean marc moreau ?

http://quanthomme.free.fr/qhsuite/2013News/Nouv230713ICCF18et%20Hydrogene.htm

http://www.utopiatechlab.com/

and his book

http://www.utopiatechlab.com/data/documents/ENCODAGE-de-la-MATIERE_Ebook-de-Soutien.pdf

there is several thread ( in french ) on this ... mirabella , the boat "mig675" and so on

[woopy]

Hi all

the infos are flying at light speed, ( eventually more HiHi )

very good info, merci  Tagor

And now , i hope that some practical reproductible experiment will be afforadable ??

For me, i  have learned that the Defkalion produces strong magnetic fields, I will try to install magnets arround my reactors to see if any difference can be detected in input or output power. '

Let's try everything

Thanks to all for sharing

Laurent

[profitis]

@woopy magnetic fields are and were occuring all over these reactors all the time.chemo-magnetic,oscillo-magnetic,piezo-magnetic,plasmo-magnetic etc..etc..opens up light on brian ahern,s theory of a 2nd law infarction in the nickel crystalites themselves.wether its nuclear events or not a 2nd law infarction is going to happen here either to trigger or sustain our overunity heat.its interesting to note that in rossi,s earlier reactors the temperature was maintained at around the curie point of nickel.

[JouleSeeker]

yes , very important

Hi , prof do you know utopia tech and jean marc moreau ?

http://quanthomme.free.fr/qhsuite/2013News/Nouv230713ICCF18et%20Hydrogene.htm

http://www.utopiatechlab.com/

and his book

http://www.utopiatechlab.com/data/documents/ENCODAGE-de-la-MATIERE_Ebook-de-Soutien.pdf

there is several thread ( in french ) on this ... mirabella , the boat "mig675" and so on

Intriguing!  thanks for the links which I did visit.  Can you explain -- how is Moreau using hydrogen?  does his engine run on hydrogen?

  Woopy -- yes, I agree that adding B fields to your experiments is a good idea.  These may need to be strong CHANGING magnetic fields however, and that is not so easy to do IMO...

[JouleSeeker]

More notes from the conference -
1.  Celani showed his constantan wire + hydrogen gas (not deuterium) in S. Korea at ICCF-17 last year and several have attempted replications.  From reports, not much has come of replications (unfortunately) but replicators are still trying.  The Celani expt using constantan wire is described here by Celani et al:  http://www.francescocelanienergy.org/iccf-17.html

2.  I heard over and over that the "theory of cold fusion is weak" -- no consensus on how the anomalous heat (of "cold fusion") is achieved.  See for example attached from the concluding panel discussion of experts - both Park of S. Korea and Kitamura of Japan ("yet to be explained") emphasize the lack of theoretical explanation -- and the lack of SUFFICIENT nuclear products to accompany the anomalous heat observed.

3.  My poster paper addressed this problem.  My proposal was that people consider "non-chemical" and "non-NUCLEAR" explanations for the anomalous heat.  That is, get away from LENR notions/fetters and consider "currently unknown/untapped" sources of energy.  When asked, I spoke of dark energy and its unknown coupling to visible matter, and of Casimir forces -- as EXAMPLES of what COULD account for the anomalous energy seen.  I also spoke of "freedom energy" as we discuss on these threads.  Some were receptive to this "broadening of outlook".

4.  I learned that Dr. Mitchell Swartz had received a "security order" on one of his patent applications.  Swartz is a friend, studying hydrogen loading in metals -- and the impact of B fields on anomalous heat.  He works generally in the mW to hundreds of mW with his small NANOR devices (no deuterium), but sees rather dramatic effects, particularly when he CHANGES the strong external magnetic field on his devices. 

Now why would the USPTO place a security order on his patent application?  (He was ordered not to TALK about his device or findings, due to "possible national security issues.")   I find this an intriguing situation, and a concern.  He could not talk about this while the security order was in effect -- but after FOUR months following his complaint about this order to the USPTO, the security order was lifted!

This suggests to me that my friend was on to something, something about changing magnetic fields perhaps... 
  I hope to pursue this further.