PhysicsProf Steven E. Jones circuit shows 8x overunity ?

[forest]

I think I know this one!  Magnetic fields at 90 degree angles to each other pass thru each other without interfering with each others flux.  (Lots of each others sorry). So magnetic fields have phasing, would this mean other fields have polarization to?  Whats your understanding on this effect Steve?
How can we apply this to our builds to an advantage?

Hope

Somebody did that already. Flayd Sparky Sweet. Remember - nothing is something !

[jbignes5]

The next question is -- why does the bifilar-wound coil have greater L than the single-wound coil?  both have a total of 30 turns...

@Gyula:
Thanks,  Gyula

I will try that experiment, good idea (when I get back up to the University).
Thanks. 
Steve

I would suggest that they both have the same L. What is different is exactly what Tesla states and that is, that the normal coils have the BEMF restricting the flow of current through self induction. The bifilar coil is designed to counter the BEMF and runs unrestricted except for the normal wires resistive value. That one fact allows the field to build in a much greater capacity in and around the bifilar coil. I bet, if you designed your little system there to pulse the bifilar coil in a burst mode you would see a much bigger field happen because the burst would flow though the bifilar very very fast with little restriction and would allow you more field to collect through an external pickup coil as well.

[xee2]

The next question is -- why does the bifilar-wound coil have greater L than the single-wound coil?  both have a total of 30 turns...

It is the way the induced currents add up in each case. No simple math solution. Needs to be solved like arbitrary shaped wire antenna problem. Look in antenna theory text books and/or look at Lawrence Livermore national laboratory NEC computer code.

[ltseung888]

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/8694-multiple-lcr-resonance-circuits-3.html

Dear Prof. Jones,

I finally have one Atten Oscilloscope in USA.  Another one is in transit and should arrive within 3 weeks.

I put much information on the energetic forum for discussion and stored the daily development information at my bench (ltseung888) at overunityresearch.com.

With the single Atten oscillocaope, I managed to do the following:

1.   Obtain the mean Power via saving the csv files.  The csv file format is compatible with EXCEL and thus I can do much analysis.

2.   Use the Output mean Power and Input mean Power to obtain COP and the results of all the prototype in USA showed COP>1 after tuning.

3.   The tuning was achieved by observing the Output Power waveform and placing the connection wires closer or further away from each other.  Another trick was to unplug the electronic component from the breadboard and re-plug them elsewhere.  Such action should affect the effective capacitance value.

4.   I managed to detect voltage activity after the Secondary was tune to produce standing waves and the battery was taken away.  The waveform was compared with the background case of probes connected to nothing (or to non-resonance circuit).

5.   As you have already experienced, slight modification of the circuit â€" including placing the hand close to it, could affect the resulting waveform.  In tuning with one oscilloscope, I cannot guarantee the same configuration on disconnecting the Input probes and then use them to measure output.  The coming second oscilloscope will solve this problem.

My gut feel at this point is that two or more LCR circuits in a toroid set up may act in a similar fashion to tuning forks on resonance boxes.  Two or more tuning forks placed appropriately will sound louder and last longer than when one is struck alone.  The multiple LCR circuits may do even better in leading-out or bringing-in electron motion energy of the orbiting electrons.  The Steven Mark TPU is not a hoax.  My research so far is leading in the same direction.

See the above link for details.

May God bless and guide us all.

[JouleSeeker]

Steven

there's a new arrangement being reported on the 'Joule Thief' thread where the circuit is run from two batteries in series and two similar batteries are placed in parallel to receive some re-charge at the connection between the supply and the oscillator - the parallel batteries can receive charge both from the supply and from the coil-field collapse current, fed back thro' a diode or LED

the initial idea is to run the circuit for some time, then swap the charging batteries to become the new supply and make the previous supply batteries receive a charge - over time the graph of the battery voltages will show if the batteries are charging/self-sustaining/discharging

i've made a new inverted looped variant of your SJ1 circuit to include this feature and i'm now including it with my other ongoing logging of SJ1 variants - i'm using 2 pairs of AAA NiMHs for this experiment

thanks
np


http://docsfreelunch.blogspot.com

Thank you, NP!  exciting work.  Please keep us informed of your continued results as the tests you are conducting progress.

PS -- what transistor did you use?  and cap of C1?