Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



PhysicsProf Steven E. Jones circuit shows 8x overunity ?

Started by JouleSeeker, May 19, 2011, 11:21:55 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 52 Guests are viewing this topic.

synchro1

Quote from Wikipedia:

"The faster a magnetic field collapses, the greater the induced voltage".

Dr. Jones's backwards charge snap is at the speed of light, unlike the physical force you allude to. The more rapid field collapse and induced voltage are higher with Dr. Jones's back snap then Russ achieved with his decoupling approach.

You're making the mistake of assuming there's only one fixed amount of fly back energy available for recovery. Proper discharge timing can potentially yield many times more than the initial input pulse power from the demagnetization cycle. All you've managed to do is trivialize Dr. Jones' contribution as usual.

Farmhand

Quote from: synchro1 on July 15, 2014, 01:45:31 PM
Quote from Wikipedia:

"The faster a magnetic field collapses, the greater the induced voltage".

Dr. Jones's backwards charge snap is at the speed of light, unlike the physical force you allude to. The more rapid field collapse and induced voltage are higher with Dr. Jones's back snap then Russ achieved with his decoupling approach.

You're making the mistake of assuming there's only one fixed amount of fly back energy available for recovery. Proper discharge timing can potentially yield many times more than the initial input pulse power from the demagnetization cycle. All you've managed to do is trivialize Dr. Jones' contribution as usual.

There you go again Synchro confusing voltage and energy as the same thing. You should not be making that mistake at this point.

The produced voltage has nothing to do with the amount of energy, nothing.

..

MarkE

Quote from: synchro1 on July 15, 2014, 01:45:31 PM
Quote from Wikipedia:

"The faster a magnetic field collapses, the greater the induced voltage".
Yes, this is Faraday's Law in action.
Quote

Dr. Jones's backwards charge snap is at the speed of light, unlike the physical force you allude to. The more rapid field collapse and induced voltage are higher with Dr. Jones's back snap then Russ achieved with his decoupling approach.
No, the dv/dt is based on the derivative of the change in flux with respect to time.  That change in voltage is not motion so speed of any kind is not in play.  The power and energy to execute the physical movement are all supplied by Russ.  Higher power from Russ yields a faster movement of the pieces, a higher voltage and higher power out into the LED.
Quote

You're making the mistake of assuming there's only one fixed amount of fly back energy available for recovery. Proper discharge timing can potentially yield many times more than the initial input pulse power from the demagnetization cycle. All you've managed to do is trivialize Dr. Jones' contribution as usual.
I have applied proven physics.  You are asserting misconceptions.

synchro1


Quote from Science dictionary:

"The voltage induced in a coil of wire is directly proportional to the rate of change[/i] over time of magnetic flux (Faraday's Law: e = NdΦ/dt), this rapid collapse of magnetism around the coil produces a high voltage "spike".


QuoteQuote from Wikipedia:

"The faster a magnetic field collapses, the greater the induced voltage".

Yes, this is Faraday's Law in action.

Faraday's law applies to voltage induced in a coil of wire! Nothing to do with the PMH and impulse locking." Impulse magnetizing ferrite and producing a magnetic field in a coil of wire where Faraday's law applies are pretty far afield from each other. There's a quantum effect inside the PMH that requires more then Faraday's rule for coils to explain. Transmutation of ferrite into a higher isotope from hi voltage impulse, and domain flipping have been tested to generate anomalous energy that the linear coil exchange can't. 

MarkE

Quote from: synchro1 on July 15, 2014, 04:55:31 PM
Quote from Science dictionary:

"The voltage induced in a coil of wire is directly proportional to the rate of change[/i] over time of magnetic flux (Faraday's Law: e = NdΦ/dt), this rapid collapse of magnetism around the coil produces a high voltage "spike".


Faraday's law applies to voltage induced in a coil of wire! Nothing to do with the PMH and impulse locking." Impulse magnetizing ferrite and producing a magnetic field in a coil of wire where Faraday's law applies are pretty far afield from each other. There's a quantum effect inside the PMH that requires more then Faraday's rule for coils to explain. Transmutation of ferrite into a higher isotope from hi voltage impulse, and domain flipping have been tested to generate anomalous energy that the linear coil exchange can't.
Synchro1, Faraday's Law absolutely applies to this case. 

If you think that there is extra energy, then where are the measurements?
If you think that there is transmutation going on, then where is your evidence?  Where are assays of the materials?