A Test to Prove Gravity Has Mass

[brian334]

More proof gravity has mass is this.
The instant light is created it is traveling at the speed of light, it never has to accelerate to its maximum speed.
As far as I know that is impossible unless in some way light combines with gravity that is already moving at the speed of light.

[z.monkey]

Gravity is a function of mass, directly proportional.
More mass generates more gravity.  A photon has almost no mass, almost no gravity.
Gravity would not exist without mass, and it is only a way to describe mass.
You can determine the mass of an object by its gravity.

This should be a test to prove mass has gravity...

Drop a rock...

[onthecuttingedge2005]

When you add more energy to make light go faster it doesn't because the photon uses the additional energy to increase its frequency instead of its velocity.(we don't really know if there is a limit to a photons frequency compression). if there is then adding more energy to a photon that has maximum frequency compression can no longer apply the additional energy to its frequency and then might force the photon to go faster in velocity to accommodate the added energy. (strictly a hypothesis on my part.) however this would only apply if Photons do have a maximum frequency compression, otherwise if the compression is infinite then this hypothesis will fail.

Light always travels at light speed no matter what, some materials used in making light appear to slow down are actually absorbing the light and re-emitting the light a fraction of a second later.

now, concerning gravity, only density effects Gravity, most of the force we feel as gravity is attractive magnetic and electromagnetic fields which are far stronger in field strength than the gravity of the planet. torsion or tensor fields are mainly what gravity is, just a product of density.

Jerry

[z.monkey]

Light always travels at light speed no matter what.

That's rather academic of you.  The wavelength of photons are inversely proportional to their velocity, which is not fixed.  A gamma ray is a photon at a gamma energy level, traveling exponentially faster than a visible light photon.  Infrared Energy is photons traveling considerably slower than a visible light photon.  Science tries to explain that velocity and wavelength are separate "mechanisms" within a photon.  Tis not so, its just a little itsy bity bit of matter.  It ain't gonna do two things, it just does one...

The impetus that creates a photon is its highest velocity.  As it travels it slows down, the wavelength gets larger.  The further it travels, the slower it gets, and ultimately, at the end of its journey, it will slow down enough to move in ways other than a straight line.  At which time it will fall into a tight little spiral and join with other expired photons to become subatomic bits of matter.

See, life is analog.  Our little photon traverses the entire spectrum before it becomes a minute bit of solid matter...

[onthecuttingedge2005]

That's rather academic of you.  The wavelength of photons are inversely proportional to their velocity, which is not fixed.  A gamma ray is a photon at a gamma energy level, traveling exponentially faster than a visible light photon.  Infrared Energy is photons traveling considerably slower than a visible light photon.  Science tries to explain that velocity and wavelength are separate "mechanisms" within a photon.  Tis not so, its just a little itsy bity bit of matter.  It ain't gonna do two things, it just does one...

The impetus that creates a photon is its highest velocity.  As it travels it slows down, the wavelength gets larger.  The further it travels, the slower it gets, and ultimately, at the end of its journey, it will slow down enough to move in ways other than a straight line.  At which time it will fall into a tight little spiral and join with other expired photons to become subatomic bits of matter.

See, life is analog.  Our little photon traverses the entire spectrum before it becomes a minute bit of solid matter...

Is this your theory or someone Else's?