A Test to Prove Gravity Has Mass

[brian334]

The only posts in this topic that matter were posted by me.
Almost all the other posts in this topic are bullshit.
brian334

[sm0ky2]

well,.. seeing as you do not own a particle accelerator nor do you have access to a non-gravitational environment, nor to outerspace, or a "true vaccuum"

What is it about the test i have proposed, that you think is bullsht?
and why?

The earth is moving much faster than the velocity of gravity, if gravity HAS mass, and we can accurately measure the gravitational force to several digits.. Then the test i proposed should answer the question, yes?

This seems to me, to be more difinitive, and logical than arguing the semantics of Einsteinian theory, or attempting to measure the temperature of an asteriod in a partial vacuum littered with debris and space dust.....

Of course, if it is your intention to dismiss any peer review that comes your way, why bother asking the question?

[onthecuttingedge2005]

So mercury is falling into the sun and the moon is moving away from the earth.
I guess you have to be a intellectual to understand how that works.

Hi Brian.

it is proposed that the earth's moon 'came' from the earth from an impact during the development of the earths birth and that is a reason why it is going away from the earth. the earths moon is the only one receding from its planet in this solar system, all other moons are degrading in orbit.

[AB Hammer]

The only posts in this topic that matter were posted by me.
Almost all the other posts in this topic are bullshit.
brian334

Brian

The biggest problem is theory. When it is theory you can not call it bull___t.

Disregarding other's theory for your own is not logical. All theory has to be put to the test, not argued. If you can not put it to the test. You wait until you or someone else puts it to the test. Any other information is theory or just your opinion that may have use in setting up the test and seeing the possibilities of what we may learn.

Alan

[brian334]

Mr. Hammer,
That is exactly right, my ideas are a theory only. I purposed a test to prove my theory and at same time disprove the theory that mass changes when a particle is moving fast.