Free Energy Magnet Motor selfrunning powering lightbulb

[IotaYodi]

Could this possibly work?

[Hope]

Why doesn't the design use a second magnet 180 degrees opposite to counter the stick?  Even a second coil at the 180 degree counter balance could be made coupled with the first coil to allow in phase shifting perfectly and no timing circuit would be needed.

[caccr2000]

Motor Magnetico Argentino (Argentinean Magnetic Motor)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfg4ZLFWSG8&feature=feedlik

In this opportunity i would like to show you a completely magnetic motor. This kind of motor DOES NOT need to be supply by any kind of battery, or electrical net or solar energy, because it uses his own alimentation by spinning. And, at the same time, can generates extra electric current (as we can see, the led lights connected to the motor are on).

The principle is easy to understand. All the motors have one rotor and one stator, but in this motor, we have three neodymium discs (instead of a rotor) and two neodymium rings (instead of a stator) and one last neodymium ring that functions as a magnetic oscillator, self-excited by a stage of captors. This captors commutes the magnet's polarities.

This very same principle its now being use in our last prototype: 1 HP (600 W free). We will upload as soon as possible an explication video for the HP.

The prototype that you seeing in this video provides 50 W free (12V CC - 4 Amp).




torian.proyect@hotmail.com

[AnandAadhar]

Motor Magnetico Argentino (Argentinean Magnetic Motor)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfg4ZLFWSG8&feature=feedlik

In this opportunity i would like to show you a completely magnetic motor. This kind of motor DOES NOT need to be supply by any kind of battery, or electrical net or solar energy, because it uses his own alimentation by spinning. And, at the same time, can generates extra electric current (as we can see, the led lights connected to the motor are on).

The principle is easy to understand. All the motors have one rotor and one stator, but in this motor, we have three neodymium discs (instead of a rotor) and two neodymium rings (instead of a stator) and one last neodymium ring that functions as a magnetic oscillator, self-excited by a stage of captors. This captors commutes the magnet's polarities.

This very same principle its now being use in our last prototype: 1 HP (600 W free). We will upload as soon as possible an explication video for the HP.

The prototype that you seeing in this video provides 50 W free (12V CC - 4 Amp).




torian.proyect@hotmail.com

Interesting. Reminds us of Brady's machine. That was a hoax. He got arrested in Germany later. But hoaxes can contain a clue you might have picked up. This seems more sophisticated. I Understand there is an electrical feedback with capacitors that regulate the pulsing. Did you file for a patent, if yes, what is the number? How long does it run, does it run in the video on preloaded caps? Or does it run indefinitely? Can you load a diagram of the circuit you use? Do you want to provide enough information for us people to replicate this? Only replication will prove it right out here. Actually you should open a new thread for this...

[Honk]

What ever happened to Paul Sprain's spiral motor any way? He spent over one million dollars US on it he says.
Ray

It never worked. He got wrong data from his torque sensor fooling him into believing he got more output than input.
Later when they purchased a new and heavy duty torque sensor they had to learn the lesson the hard way.

See these links, they direct you to the statements from Terry Blanton regarding Pauls wankel.
His was one of Sprains engineers during development. Notably the last msg46786 on May 2011.
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg37212.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg37213.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg37251.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg39527.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg36955.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg40636.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg46786.html

Here's my own version of the Magnetic Wankel. And of course it was underunity.
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=3456.msg267139#msg267139
And it wouldn't matter what ever type of electromagnet shape or core material being used. Nothing works.
As long as there is a sticky spot, all you do is adding energy to the system to overcome this obstacle.
Magnetism is 100% conservative. Scientists have known this for 100 years & it's time we wake up and accept it.