PLEASE READ THIS-MAJOR BREAK THRU FROM BILL MEHESS

[ramset]

Chess
Regarding ist ,It is my opinion that he was making himself a little Crazy
by Electro shock ............

Thats all just my Opinion,However pulsing a microwave transformer thru an antennae [coil]on a regular basis in close proximity to your brain ??

My point is ,working with an itty bitty "event" that you understand
and can scale up Is a million times better than firing up Giggawatt
Coils just to see what "might" happen!

Chet

[JouleSeeker]

What is your problem, WilbyInebriated? you wrote:

you have no schematic, you have no parts list, all you have is assumption, speculation and some voltages... what you are doing is not science by any stretch of the imagination and it most certainly isn't 'rigor' either...

[snip]

Yet, you recently referred (see attached) to a thread I started months ago on the sj1 circuit, where indeed I present my schematic diagrams and even parts specifications.  And photos of the device and results.  Is this not science?  what are you talking about?

This is a thread for discussing Bill's (largely undefined) device and certainly not for attacking a particular person, which I referred to as "ad hominem [" to the man"] attacks".   Interesting in the attached, you ask TheSchuss

"which specific comment of mine did you think was 'snide' and/or offensive?"

Is this your modus, to go around making offensive remarks and then when there is a rejoinder, to demand "which specific comment of mine did you think was 'snide' and/or offensive?"  Not a very interesting or productive game, IMO.  I won't join you in that game.
(Why not start over, friend, and stick with more scientific issues than what "ad hominem attacks" means, and demanding quotes of your specific comments?)

[JouleSeeker]

    Bill, your previous youtube vids were of home-made cells or batteries, like your water+lemon-juice cell, with copper and zinc (galvanized) that I cited/URL earlier.

    We still don't know what you're going to announce in mid-Sept, but if indeed it is another cell with dissimilar metals (without a liquid electrolyte), I would hope that you would give credit to those researchers who have done similar work.  Here's just one example, by Lidmotor -- a two-penny cell without a liquid electrolyte.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTdvUUAQ0to&feature=uploademail

Best wishes,
Steve

[WilbyInebriated]

What is your problem, WilbyInebriated? you wrote:

Yet, you recently referred (see attached) to a thread I started months ago on the sj1 circuit, where indeed I present my schematic diagrams and even parts specifications.  And photos of the device and results.  Is this not science?  what are you talking about?

making assumptions, speculation and the inevitable conjecture about bill's device when you have no schematic, no parts list, just some times and voltages is not science nor what i wold call 'rigor'. what are you talking about?

This is a thread for discussing Bill's (largely undefined) device and certainly not for attacking a particular person, which I referred to as "ad hominem [" to the man"] attacks".   Interesting in the attached, you ask TheSchuss
Is this your modus, to go around making offensive remarks and then when there is a rejoinder, to demand "which specific comment of mine did you think was 'snide' and/or offensive?"  Not a very interesting or productive game, IMO.  I won't join you in that game.
(Why not start over, friend, and stick with more scientific issues than what "ad hominem attacks" means, and demanding quotes of your specific comments?)

this was a thread where bill announced his intentions to demo a device at the end of august. it was then turned into an attempt to get him to modify his plan to suit the various agendas of others. all i have been doing is asking that a little patience, respect and professionalism (by waiting until the demo and not acting like an impetuous child by constantly hounding him for more info or to change his plan, etc. ad infintum, ad nauseam) be shown. what my 'modus' may or may not be is a logical fallacy (attacking the man) and thus, irrelevant. speaking of modus... try and address the salient points of my post instead of this constant misrepresentation and redirection.

now once again... how about you try out that "rigor without rancor" you talk so much about... starting with rigor. which would be to behave professionally and wait until the 31st. sound like a plan? or are you suggesting that the assumption, speculation and the inevitable conjecture you have been engaging in is rigor? 

[JouleSeeker]

    I don't think I've been behaving like an "impetuous child", WilbyInebriated and I find your insinuation offensive.      As I wrote to Bill, one can learn a lot from the output power, and he graciously made measurements on that.

You wrote:

wait until the 31st. sound like a plan?

Aug. 31st would be fine-- but if you will read the thread, that date has been delayed.