Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

[DeepCut]

The last test of J.L.N:

http://jnaudin.free.fr/dlenz/DLE19en.htm

In fact, the distance into the coil and the magnet is important to have the delayed Lenz.

No, JLN was only showing that, in a normal generator, increasing the distance resulted in acceleration and decreased current input when on-load.

All you have to do to get delayed Lenz is wind a high-inductance coil, a coil of many turns. It doesn't even have to be bifilar.

Check this good tutorial from OverUnityGuide :

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4CUJ-q-dXiRjiUaoaM_ReAtmGyM2Ic1q


All the best,

DC.

[gotoluc]

@Luc

The water down the drain thing is a myth, the spin direction depends on initial conditions and even a minute difference in force affects the outcome.


atb,

DC.

I agree, The drain vortex direction may have been exaggerated but they have measured a difference in a controlled lab environment.
However, when it comes to Meteorology Wikipedia says this:
"High pressure systems rotate in a direction such that the Coriolis force will be directed radially inwards, and nearly balanced by the outwardly radial pressure gradient. This direction is clockwise in the northern hemisphere and counter-clockwise in the southern hemisphere. Low pressure systems rotate in the opposite direction, so that the Coriolis force is directed radially outward and nearly balances an inwardly radial pressure gradient. In each case a slight imbalance between the Coriolis force and the pressure gradient accounts for the radially inward acceleration of the system's circular motion."

Luc

[gotoluc]

LOL !

I'm getting loads of PM's now because of my post on skycollection's vid.

Maybe we should do a document so that all the info for a simple, first AUL device is in one place.

Many minds may bring new ideas.


atb,

DC.

Sounds like a goo idea!... any volunteers?

Luc

[synchro1]

Jorge replied to my youtube inquiry, and that he got "bad results" stacking the pancakes over the levitating bearing spinner. That leaves the magnet core for spare chute. Plus, I agree with the Coriolus theory!

[DeepCut]

I'll do it, i work from home so i have very long lunch hours ;+}

How's this for a rough framework, in order of complexity ?

0. Show that a standard coil exhibits drag.
1. Increasing the time constant by increasing the inductance with a high number of turns.
2. Using a bifilar/trifilar/quadfilar winding to increase the parasitic capacitance.
3. Connecting individual bifilar-wound, serially-connected coil-sections in parallel to increase current and hence the effect.
4. Wind a coil that has virtually no effect on rotor speed or input current (this is as far as i've got, with a coil that reduced frequency by ~4ms and increased input current by ~5mA).
5. Wind a coil that overspeeds the rotor by a small amount (i should have that done this weekend if my coil-former parts arrive in time).
6. Wind a coil  that overspeeds the rotor and cuts down on input current by a sizeable percentage.
7. Wind enough coils to drop input current to zero.
8. Connect those coils (in parallel ?), step-down the output and selfrun the device (yes please !).

Thoughts/comments ?


atb,

DC.