Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

Started by Overunityguide, August 30, 2011, 04:59:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

conradelektro

Progress:

By moving the coil further away from the ring magnet I could increase the speed.

12 V -->  18 mA , ~ 0.22 Watt,    84 Hz (~ 5000 rpm)

15 V -->  21 mA,  ~ 0.32 Watt,  110 Hz (~ 6600 rpm)

18 V -->  23 mA,  ,  ~ 0.42 Watt,  121 Hz (~ 7200 rpm)

An other hole is needed in the base plate in order to move the coil even further away. Has to wait till tomorrow.

Good night, Conrad

conradelektro

@Farmhand: Thank you for the explanation. I will take that into consideration.

What is your opinion about pancake coils or a stack of pancake coils as a pick up or generator coil? Would that may be exhibit some interesting strangeness?

I just like to build little motors that spin rapidly (must be the child in me). My knowledge of electronics is very little, therefore I am not really expecting to discover OU. It is just a hobby.

Greetings, Conrad

DeepCut

Quote from: conradelektro on April 11, 2013, 04:05:29 PM
@Farmhand: Thank you for the explanation. I will take that into consideration.

What is your opinion about pancake coils or a stack of pancake coils as a pick up or generator coil? Would that may be exhibit some interesting strangeness?

I just like to build little motors that spin rapidly (must be the child in me). My knowledge of electronics is very little, therefore I am not really expecting to discover OU. It is just a hobby.

Greetings, Conrad

Nice build Conrad :)

Even if i multiply your RPM by 10 to be around my 40KRPM, you would still be using a lot less power than my setup.


All the best,

DC.

gyulasun

Hi Conrad,

Here are some p-channel MOSFET types, I used Farnell but if you have a local cheaper source for those types, you could order from it of course. By the way, I think at least a 3-5 Amper drain current rated type is to be preffered versus the only 1A or so types because in case you lower the coils DC resistance, you do not have to change the MOSFETs. I think that even the 40-80 Ohm relay coils still cause losses but at least they are ready made and you do not have to wind them for the tests. Another factor is the drain-source voltage rating due to the voltage spikes at the coils switch-off times, even the 100V ratings may be a bad choice, at least the 200V rating is preferred, albeit the two MOSFETs are in series from the coil point of view, so their voltage ratings also add up.
http://uk.farnell.com/international-rectifier/irf9630pbf/transistor-mosfet-polarity-p/dp/1653665 (200V/6.5A 0.8 Ohm)
http://uk.farnell.com/infineon/spd04p10pl-g/mosfet-p-ch-100v-4-2a-to252-3/dp/2212868   (100V/4.2A 0.55 Ohm)
http://uk.farnell.com/diodes-inc/zxmp10a18ktc/mosfet-p-ch-100v-3-8a-dpak/dp/1843773RL  (100V/3.8A 0.15 Ohm)

"Horse shoe + two drive coils + two Hall sensors, where does the generator coil go?"

Well, the simplest (perhaps) would be to use a longer shaft (or two shafts in line tied together, this would involve one more ball bearing at least) on which two ring magnets could be fixed: one is for the motor, the other is for the generator. More about this tomorrow.




Hi Deepcut,

The explanation is coil inductive reactance, that is which limits your output power. To understand this better, you have an 1.2 Henry coil (when aircored) with a 166 Ohm DC wire resistance. This gives a 2Pi*f*L inductive reactance, f is the frequency depending on the RPM. Say, with 600 Hz, this gives 6.28*600*1.2=4520 Ohm.  With a core, this is rougly 4 times as many, cca 18 kOhm.
So your coil behaves as a generator with an unloaded output voltage, 120V when rectified and unfiltered, and which has at least a 4.5 kOhm inner impedance. If you connect a 10 Ohm, 100 Ohm resistor across this coil, then you have a voltage divider whereby the AC equivalent of the DC 120V feeds at least a 4.5 kOhm coil impedance and the load resistor in series, what remains across the load is very low, allmost all the induced power  is wasted in the coil. 
You may use a step down transformer directly at the coil output but off the shelf mains transformers made for 50 Hz mains frequency may introduce losses at the 400-600 Hz frequency range.
Another possibility is to tune out the inductive reactance with an identical capacitive reactance and there remains the coil winding resistance which will give the generator output resistance, 166 Ohm but this would be valid at and near to a single RPM frequency.

Gyula

DeepCut

Thanks Gyula, that makes it all clear.

And thanks FarmHand, food for thought.


All the best,

DC.