Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

[Kator01]

Hello wings,

what magtech presents here is very old stuff, goes way back to somewhere between 1898 to 1930  and is called "magnetic amplifier"
They ceased teaching this in germany at the technical universities in 1960. I was lucky to find a book in an east-germany university-library : Transductor-controlling technology, which is a very good and stable method to control hydroxy-cells.

I doubt it will be possible to patent this old technique.

Regards

Kator01

[CRANKYpants]

Hi All

So the result is very interesting and is confirming the Thane's experiment another time.

Laurent

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrbEtXCsXiw

NICE WORK LAURENT,

I SUGGEST YOU TRY ANOTHER TEST AT 600 RPM AND I BET YOU WILL SEE DECELERATION EVEN WITH A SHORT.

OR CHANGE YOUR SERIES CONNECTED BI-FILAR TO PARALLEL CONNECTED BI-FILAR AND SEE MASSIVE BRAKING EFFECTS.

KIND REGARDS
Thane

[CRANKYpants]

generator [ˈdÊ'É›nəˌreɪtÉ™]n
1. (Physics / General Physics) Physics
a. any device for converting mechanical energy into electrical energy by electromagnetic induction,

I HAVE SAID IT BEFORE AND I WILL SAY IT AGAIN...THE INPUT TO AN ELECTRIC GENERATOR IS:
THE MECHANICAL POWER IN THE DRIVE SHAFT WHICH = THE DRIVE SHAFT TORQUE x DRIVE SHAFT SPEED.

INPUT POWER = TORQUE x SPEED

THE INPUT POWER IS THEREFORE THE DRIVE SHAFT POWER PRIOR TO LOADING DIVIDED BY THE OUTPUT (WHICH IS THE ELECTRICAL LOADED POWER OUTPUT).

EFFICIENCY = ELECTRICAL OUTPUT/MECHANICAL INPUT x 100

IN A CONVENTIONAL SYSTEM THE MECHANICAL INPUT ALWAYS HAS TO BE INCREASED TO MAINTAIN THE LOAD (MORE TORQUE ADDED) AND THIS ADDED TORQUE x THE SPEED IS THE INPUT ENERGY VALUE.

IN THE ReGenX SCENARIO THE MECHANICAL OUTPUT IS GREATER AFTER LOADING THAN BEFORE LOADING SO THAT ALONE MAKES THE SYSTEM OVER 100% EFFICIENT (MECHANICAL OUTPUT IS GREATER THAN MECHANICAL INPUT BECAUSE TORQUE AND SPEED ARE BOTH HIGHER AFTER LOADING)

EFFICIENCY = MECHANICAL OUTPUT (GENERATOR LOADED) / MECHANICAL INPUT (GENERATOR UNLOADED) x 100 

IF OUTPUT ELECTRICITY IS ALSO PRODUCED THE EFFICIENCY IS THEN:

EFFICIENCY = MECHANICAL OUTPUT (GENERATOR LOADED) + ELECTRICAL OUTPUT / MECHANICAL INPUT (GENERATOR UNLOADED) x 100   

SO EVERYONE WHO HAS EVER BEEN ABLE TO PRODUCE ACCELERATION WHILE LOADING THEIR GENERATOR HAS SUCCEEDED IN PRODUCING AN OVERUNITY DEVICE!

CONGRATULATIONS! I JUST WANT TO PUBLICLY ACKNOWLEDGE YOUR EFFORTS BECAUSE FEW PEOPLE WILL.  AND FEWER STILL WILL UNDERSTAND.   

KIND REGARDS
Thane

Thane C. Heins
President
Potential +/- Difference Inc. R & D
"The Transition of Power"
thaneh@potentialdifference.ca
Linkedin http://linkd.in/iIZyXF 

[Qwert]

Hi, all.
The subject of the "magnetic amplifier" raised here by woopy and Kator01, is described in page 97 (110 of 187) of the book "Practical-Transformer-Handbook" by Irving Gottlieb (187 pages in .pdf) and the link to it you can find here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6763.msg302197#msg302197

there is also another publication on the Internet "magnetic amplifiers" by George Trinkaus:
http://www.themeasuringsystemofthegods.com/magnetic%20amplifiers.pdf

as well as "Magnetic Amplifier Control for Simple, Low-Cost, Secondary Regulation" by Bob Mammano:
http://www.ti.com/lit/ml/slup129/slup129.pdf

[shimondoodkin]

seems like the non-mechanical the coils only effect is generally understood,but
is there any beneficial overunity in coil only? (mechanical over unity i understand)