FIRST FREE ENERGY DEVICE REACHES MARKET IN OCTOBER -- The Game Changer is Here

[ramset]

Well,
When you two are done chewin on each other heres someone who has a stake in this game

William R. Lyne

Quote:

THE LYNE ATOMIC HYDROGEN FURNACE IS THE ROSSI-FOCARDI LENR DEVICE

In answer to your wonderings, the Lyne Atomic Hydrogen Furnace is the basis for the Rossi-Focardi LENR device, though the two Italian university professors created an ingenious version of my reaction chamber by packing a stainless steel cylinder completely with the "catalytic metal", nickel. They are not admitting where they got the idea. In 2003, I was made an honorary member of a Rome group of researchers Altra Scienza which can be verified by referring to http://asse.altervista.org/lahg.pdf and Swedish Researchers confirm Rossi and Focardi Energy Catalyzer as a Nuclear Process . I granted the Italian group permission to make copies of my Chapter VI from my1997 book Occult Ether Physics (1998 second ed.). That is apparently how the two university professors in Bologna obtained access to my plans (particularly page 103, "...the reactor surfaces which receive and catalyze the recombining gas atoms.") and page 104, "Activation energy" device (spark plug, catalytic metal, etc.).
I invented the Lyne Atomic Hydrogen Furnace in the embodiment contained in my book. Irving Langmuir discovered the atomic hydrogen reaction and invented the atomic hydrogen blowtorch, but he failed to realize that the process was over-unity because he was a relativist so he calculated (not measured) the input energy as being equal to the output as measured by him. I also invented the idea of the circuitous use of hydrogen over and over so no additional hydrogen is required, and is not "used up" but recycled.
The lack of hydrogen consumption in the Rossi-Focardi LENR and the failure to lose mass even in the long tests providing massive amounts of free energy prove that the process is not "cold fusion" and also disproves Einstein's equation, E=MC squared.
It is my belief that this invention and its energy can only be explained by ether physics, although certain physical processes can be explained by traditional means.
The transmutation of the nickel to copper is a surprise to me but may be explained by k-capture in which an electron is captured by a nickel proton producing a new neutron which would make it copper. I explain the reaction as follows: hydrogen is a light element. All light elements transmute in UV light. Transmutation is a "nuclear" process though it may produce no external harmful radiation. Tesla's theory of radioactivity is that radioactivity is the product of an element or compound with what he called Primary Solar Rays, which in effect can be captured by so-called radioactive elements (and therefore by artificially radioactive elements). So the excess energy is the product of the conversion of the energy of the ubiquitous Primary Solar Ray particles (produced by stars) into IR radiation (heat).
The plans in my 1997 (first ed.) and 1998 (second ed.) are fourteen years old. Since that time I have radically redesigned the furnace in such a way that anything anyone has achieved so far with my information is only scratching the surface.

From here
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/4298-atomic-hydrogen-furnace-cop-21-a-4.html#post158374

Chet

[chessnyt]

Thank you Chet.  I had been trying to tell Jerry that it is NOT cold fusion and I even stated to Jerry that I NEVER used the term “cold fusion” to describe Rossi’s invention anywhere in this thread.  He went on to bash Ponds and Fleishman when their experiments were not the same as Rossi’s.  He assumed (without researching) Rossi was using cold fusion.

The technology is awesome and the potential is limitless.  I am currently in the process of finishing my own experiments in a different energy from water technology.  My lab has been taken over by it.  I try to finish what I start. 

I think that Rossi’s technology holds the most promise as it is able to recycle the same hydrogen over and over again.


Nice article Chet 

Chess 

[chessnyt]

In all fairness, Rossi’s E-Cat technology can be considered a variation of cold fusion.  The only reasons I don’t consider it cold fusion per Pons and Fleischmann is because:

   a.   Rossi uses a different catalyst in his process.
   b.   Cold fusion per Fleischmann and Pons does not yield a successful result (energy gain) in every experiment thus it lacks consistency and reliability.  In fact, to say that the success rate is less than 50% is being generous.  Rossi’s E-cat technology yields a successful result (measurable energy gains) in every experiment making it the reliable and viable alternative to cold fusion per Pons and Fleischmann. 
   c.   Pons and Fleischmann used a palladium electrode while Rossi uses nickel.

In order for statement “b” to be true, something must in fact be different between the two technologies and so they can not be considered the same when the results are not consistent with one another.

Rossi has recently announced that he has sold his house in order to raise the capital to ensure the on time completion of the megawatt power plant in October.  If he is a fraud, he is now a homeless one.  This is certainly not consistent with the M.O. of a con artist.


Chess

[chessnyt]

Hello everyone,

A specific test date in October has been set and will give scientists from around the world a chance to examine Rossi’s E-Cat up close and see for themselves how the E-Cat performs under testing which is biased against it (as the heat exchanger being used for the testing is NOT 100% efficient) yet Rossi is still claiming it will show measureable energy gains despite the deck being stacked against it. 

The date of the testing is October 6, 2011.  The following is a list of what we know so far about
the upcoming test:

•   It will be a test of the new model of E-Cat module that will be used in the one megawatt plant.
•   The module will be opened so the scientists present can measure the weight and volume of all components.
•   It will be an extended test of at least 12 hours, but maybe longer.
•   The ability of the system to run in a self sustaining mode of operation will be tested.
•   There will be two circuits of water, and a heat exchanger that will transfer heat between the two circuits. The first circuit will be closed, and the water in it will be continually recycled. This eliminates the issue of steam dryness.
•   The test will be biased against the E-Cat, because some of the heat produced by the reactor will be lost. This is because the efficiency of the heat exchanger will be less than 100%.
•   Scientists from around the world have been invited to attend this test.
•   Radiation measurements will be taken to show that no radiation is escaping from the reactor.

Here’s a link to the story:
http://pesn.com/2011/09/26/9501920_NobelPrize_Laureate_to_Test_Cold_Fusion_E-Cat/

P.S.  If you are sure this technology will be a failure on the big testing date, buy up all the oil futures and other energy related stocks one day before the October 6, 2011 test date.  You will be SO rich if you’re right!!!  On the other hand, if you believe the Eâ€"Cat will pass these rigorous tests set forth on the 6th, you might want to UNLOAD all your energy related stocks before the test date.  If you're right, your energy related stocks will start to plummet before your eyes like never before

It’s a beautiful day!!!!!!!

Chess   

[chessnyt]

I just added a poll to this thread to see where you, the alternative energy buffs, stand on the E-Cat technology and its claims of over unity.

Chess