FIRST FREE ENERGY DEVICE REACHES MARKET IN OCTOBER -- The Game Changer is Here

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rosemary:  I had the same reaction to Larson and his disrespect for P & F.  Good post thanks.

Thanks Bernie,

And welcome to the discussion.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

[poynt99]

Another point of view:

Editor, the Tribune: I would like to comment on the Dec. 3 story “MU research chief wants ‘cold fusion’ puzzle solved.” I agree with Professor Robert Duncan on the importance of the scientific method and, furthermore, scientific protocol. Duncan’s suggestion that Andrea Rossi has “empirical results,” however, concerns me. Nobody has seen or tested any Rossi device outside of Rossi’s garage, let alone done so independently. No visiting scientists have been allowed to properly measure and inspect Rossi’s device.
I interviewed Andrea Rossi in Bologna, Italy, on June 15. I had to explain to him the term “control experiment.” Rossi is fluent in English. Once he understood, he said he used “many metals” for a control. Rossi and his colleague Sergio Focardi said they had submitted their paper to multiple scientific journals but that all had rejected the paper unfairly. In fact, they did not submit their paper to any journal, only to arXiv. Rossi published the paper on his blog instead. On camera, Rossi demonstrated to me how his machine worked, a video of which can be found online at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-8QdVwY98E.
By all accounts, the visual evidence was grossly inconsistent with his claim. The list goes on. “Professor Rossi,” as Duncan calls him, has no affiliation with any university. He has a degree in philosophy and a degree in chemical engineering from what CBS calls a “diploma mill.” Anybody involved in the LENR field who condones or, worse, promotes Rossi’s unscientific behavior and claim does himself and the LENR field a tremendous disservice.
Steven B. Krivit, senior editor,
New Energy Times executive director,
New Energy Institute Inc.
369-B Third St., Suite 556
San Rafael, Calif., 94901

http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/2011/dec/09/professor-rossi-cant-back-up-his-claims/

and this one:
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-11-rossi-e-cat-customers.html

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hello Poynty Point,

Golly.  Have you taken over from JouleSeeker here?  I have been watching your own forum closely and it occurred to me that you were all trying very hard not to notice the 'elephant in the armchair' - squatting slap bang in the middle of your sitting room.   

But I must commend you on your 'due dilligence'.  You need to follow the allegations of Steven Krivit very closely.  He's an entire authority on matters scientific and chemical - and both Rossi and Professor Sergio Focardi (that 'colleague' that Krivit referred to) need to have the principle of a 'control' experiment - explained in words of not more than one syllable.  Thank heavens that Krivit was qualified enough to alert them to this need. 

Also.  It does, indeed, seem only fair and reasonable to not only protect the buying public from the error of their ways - but that there are those such as you, that take the trouble to warn us all.  We would all probably benefit from your own genius which is to apply that trick of denying the evidence in the face of the evidence.  Scientifically it's not only profound - but judicious.  And while it may not advance new science - then, what the hell.  Who needs new science?  Certainly not our energy monopolists. 

So.  Again.  All I can say, in conclusion is....  Actually the truth is that I'm lost for words.  A rare condition for me.

Here's one. 
Golly. 

Kindest regards.
Rosie Posie

HEAVILY EDITED.



And here's another addition and yet more on the subject for anyone who's interested.
http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/2011/12/208-elephant-in-arm-chair.html

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Apologies for a consecutive post.  But I missed this. 

It seems that Professor Robert Duncan referrred to Rossi's 'empirical results'.  Krivit on the other hand insinuates that there are none.  On the whole I suppose one should support Krivit over Professor Robert Duncan.  Perhaps the accreditation and careful measurements by  a mere handful of experts is absolutely NOT to be believed under any circumstances at all.  We all know that Krivit is not following an agenda.  Nothing could be fairer than that article he published. 

Here's that extract.

Again, kindest
Rosemary

I would like to comment on the Dec. 3 story “MU research chief wants ‘cold fusion’ puzzle solved.” I agree with Professor Robert Duncan on the importance of the scientific method and, furthermore, scientific protocol. Duncan’s suggestion that Andrea Rossi has “empirical results,” however, concerns me. Nobody has seen or tested any Rossi device outside of Rossi’s garage, let alone done so independently. No visiting scientists have been allowed to properly measure and inspect Rossi’s device.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

  Here's the actual article referred to. Slightly less partial - I might add.  And nota bene.  There's an acknowledgement that these claims are going to keep 'popping up'.  That's a euphemism for 'explode into public awareness' 

Regards,
Rosemary

Sorry.  I published a copy of the entire article.  I think I should just have put in the link.  Here it is.
http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/2011/dec/03/mu-research-chief-wants-cold-fusion-puzzle-solved/