FIRST FREE ENERGY DEVICE REACHES MARKET IN OCTOBER -- The Game Changer is Here

[chessnyt]

Mr Chess Knight,

You really need to read my post for carefully before
you inaccurately characterize it as being negative!

Nowhere in it do I say that the results of the
test were negative in fact it indicates the results
were quite sufficiently positive.

I am critical of the man Rossi and his methods and
this is simply a summary of those criticisms most
which are most likely held by others attending the demonstration.

You see, nothing is really black and white. Rossi's
demonstration was horrible but not a failure and
I was attempting to explain why. Also, there are cost issues
associated with running 1MW reactor hardware
below full power output that needs to be considered
in the future. The reaction may be success but the product
can still fail in the marketplace - A Rossi selection,
I might add. This real lack of having a high resolution demonstration may also be a factor in US press refusing to report it.

So please next time, read first before you post.

:S:MarkSCoffman

@Mr. Coffman:
In an earlier posting of yours, you tried to compare Rossi’s device with a heat pump. This is absolutely preposterous!  Heat pumps have been around for quite some time and if they could equal the performance of the E-Cat in self-sustain mode, then they would be used by the public right now to power their homes.  Now if a heat pump is running your house, right now, then I will apologize for taking your last post in a negative way. 


Regards,

Chess

[firlight]

These are the first four stages involved in any new revolutionary development:

1.  It’s nonsense.  Don’t waste my time.
2.  Oh, it’s interesting but it isn’t important.
3.  I always said it was a good idea.
4.  I thought of it first.

Spot on Chess
I reckon Rossi has got it.I have seen replication attempts  at cold fusion years ago at universities ,these replications were not true replications more attempt to discredit cold fusion.
I like This  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mu_iwdjf1gI


Regards Dave  High energy particle physics retired

[Poit]

Chess,
I run a small website (http://www.stuffundertherug.com/) designed to keep alive information that the government would rather suppress. I added a few articles in regards to Rossi. If you think I should add more, by all means, send me links

Poit

[chessnyt]

Chess,
I run a small website (http://www.stuffundertherug.com/) designed to keep alive information that the government would rather suppress. I added a few articles in regards to Rossi. If you think I should add more, by all means, send me links

Poit

@Poit:
I visited your site which was full of interesting stories that ranged in subject matter from the FBI to Apple, who is suing Samsung over patent infringement.

This following link is to a respected UK technology media outlet which did a feature article on the E-Cat.  The rest are an assortment of miscellaneous sites.

http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2011-10/06/e-cat-cold-fusion

http://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=3322

http://www.midasoracle.org/2011/10/07/scientific-review-of-andrea-rossis-e-cat-report/

http://coldfusion3.com/blog/bologna-e-cat-test-a-success


This last link is a video made on the day the E-Cat was tested of the test itself:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8raJiIZWInY&feature=player_embedded


Best regards,

Chess

[sparks]

   I look at it this way.  Chances of two neuclei fusing in an atomic lattice are way better than fusing in a heated plasma magnetically confined or whatever.  Hot fusion is like trying to have two bullets collide and become one bullet and the two guns they are shot from are miles apart.  Now if the two guns share a common barrel then the odds are significantly increased that the bullets will fuse especially if the common barrel is slightly longer than the diameter of the bullet. Not sure if Rossi is claiming fusion but a simple test for helium production would be a place to start.