FIRST FREE ENERGY DEVICE REACHES MARKET IN OCTOBER -- The Game Changer is Here

[happyfunball]

Steorn's website is still up and running, they're probably even selling a few magnetic bearings and  useless 'Orbo kits.' Moral of the story: There are no repercussions for OU con artists. Rossi is obviously quite aware of this fact.  It's really pretty amazing.

[gravityblock]

Hi all,

Here is a image of .....

"The Electromagnetic Spectrum"
Westinghouse Research Laboratories

Chart - MB 1957    28" high x 41" long
Westinghouse Electrical Corporation
Printing Division    Trafford, Pa
Copyright 1961  by
Westinghouse Electric Corporation


FTC

This spectrum is of the electromagnetic force.  Now, extend the concept of the electromagnetic spectrum to include the weak nuclear force.  The electromagnetic force is infinite in range, however the weak nuclear force is a very strong force over a tiny range interacting with the heavier W & Z bosons.  This is what mainstream science is missing.  What I'm saying easily explains why these gamma rays are incapable of penetrating a thin lead shield, however your ideas are based around a science which says these gamma rays should easily penetrate a thin layer of lead.  What does the experimental evidence support?  It supports that these gamma rays do not have the ability to penetrate through a thin layer of lead, which is opposite to what is expected in the currently accepted theory.  It's called Low Level Nuclear Reactions for a reason.  It's occurring at much lower energy levels than what was predicted by mainstream physics.

Gravock

[gravityblock]

Hi all,

Here is a image of .....

"The Electromagnetic Spectrum"
Westinghouse Research Laboratories

Chart - MB 1957    28" high x 41" long
Westinghouse Electrical Corporation
Printing Division    Trafford, Pa
Copyright 1961  by
Westinghouse Electric Corporation


FTC

This spectrum is of the electromagnetic force.  Now, extend the concept of the electromagnetic spectrum to include the weak nuclear force.  The electromagnetic force is infinite in range, however the weak nuclear force is a very strong force over a tiny range interacting with the heavier W & Z bosons.  This is what mainstream science is missing.  What I'm saying easily explains why these gamma rays are incapable of penetrating a thin lead shield, however your ideas are based around a science which says these gamma rays should easily penetrate a thin layer of lead.  What does the experimental evidence support?  It supports that these gamma rays do not have the ability to penetrate through a thin layer of lead, which is opposite to what is expected in the currently accepted theory.  It's called Low Level Nuclear Reactions for a reason.  It's occurring at much lower energy levels than what was predicted by mainstream physics.

Gravock

[MileHigh]

Rosemary:

Please find references to support two of your statements and one implicit statement:

1.  Gamma rays are particles.
2.  Gravity does not affect small particles
3.  The mass cutoff-for small particles when they transition from gravity affecting them to not affecting them.

Just our of curiosity and without looking it up, can you explain the process that results in the aurora borealis?

Which means that most atoms should be subject to complete and continual degradation and end up as a pool of disassociated particles - resting on the floor of the some kind of tenuous structure - in layers that are differentiated by size in relation to their weight mass.  LOL.

I haven't the slightest clue what you are talking about.  Perhaps you could explain that in more detail.

MileHigh

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hello again MilesUpInTheSky

Rosemary:

Please find references to support two of your statements and one implicit statement:

1.  Gamma rays are particles.
2.  Gravity does not affect small particles
3.  The mass cutoff-for small particles when they transition from gravity affecting them to not affecting them.

Just our of curiosity and without looking it up, can you explain the process that results in the aurora borealis?

I haven't the slightest clue what you are talking about.  Perhaps you could explain that in more detail.

MileHigh

You ask me to support MY claims?

1.  Gamma rays are particles.  NOT MY CLAIM
2.  Gravity does not affect small particles  NOT MY CLAIM
3.  The mass cutoff-for small particles when they transition from gravity affecting them to not affecting them. NOT ONLY NOT MY CLAIM BUT NOT ON TOPIC
aurora borealis  - NOT ON TOPIC and I'm not about to give you a science lesson.

Could I impose on you to open a thread related to any extraneous subjects than this thread topic.  It would be an interesting engagement. Especially as it relates to particles that respond to a gravitational field. 

lol  OR AS YOU PUT IT
LOLOLOLOLOL


Ever rosier
Rosie Pose