FIRST FREE ENERGY DEVICE REACHES MARKET IN OCTOBER -- The Game Changer is Here

[Rosemary Ainslie]

My brain is hurting!

It's because you can't draw the distinction between 'MY' claims and the claims proposed by standard physics.  To the best of my knowledge mine and standard physics are very much in SYNCH.

Again and ever,
Rosie

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Your brain is really hurting!

I think the psychological term is 'projection'.  LOL.  My brain is fine.  But I can't answer for yours.

And yet again,
and always
Rosie  Posie
edited

[MileHigh]

It's a sandbox on acid.

[MileHigh]

Gravityblock:

This spectrum is of the electromagnetic force.  Now, extend the concept of the electromagnetic spectrum to include the weak nuclear force.  The electromagnetic force is infinite in range, however the weak nuclear force is a very strong force over a tiny range interacting with the heavier W & Z bosons.  This is what mainstream science is missing.  What I'm saying easily explains why these gamma rays are incapable of penetrating a thin lead shield, however your ideas are based around a science which says these gamma rays should easily penetrate a thin layer of lead.  What does the experimental evidence support?  It supports that these gamma rays do not have the ability to penetrate through a thin layer of lead, which is opposite to what is expected in the currently accepted theory.  It's called Low Level Nuclear Reactions for a reason.  It's occurring at much lower energy levels than what was predicted by mainstream physics.

Are you saying that this whole business about gamma rays being particles is your own personal theory?

Rosemary:

It's because you can't draw the distinction between 'MY' claims and the claims proposed by standard physics.  To the best of my knowledge mine and standard physics are very much in SYNCH.

Same question for you.  Are you saying that this whole business about gamma rays being particles is your own personal theory?

MileHigh

[TinselKoala]

This is hilarious.

Everybody in the world who knows anything at all about the Standard Model, to which RA so casually refers, understands that:

ALPHA radiation consists of relatively heavy PARTICLES which are helium nuclei (two protons and two neutrons, bound together) stripped of their electrons. They aren't very energetic and can be stopped with minimal shielding. If you have a tremendous amount of them they can be dangerous but usually aren't.
BETA radiation consists of ELECTRONS, accelerated and ejected by various processes among which is Beta Decay of a nucleon, which is mediated by the Weak nuclear force. But that has nothing to do with the fact that an accelerated electron coming at you is a BETA "particle", is charged and therefore can be ionising, and can also be stopped with minimal shielding. Again, in massive quantities and with large energies they can be damaging.

And finally,

GAMMA radiation is electromagnetic, consists of photons/waves just like light, only much much more energetic. They are energetic enough to punch though a lot of shielding and can knock electrons out of atoms (hence "ionizing" them and destroying the molecules they are in).

These are accepted definitions, available in literally thousands of resources on the internet. The only place you will find mention of gamma rays as "particles" though... is right here.

But the real issue is this: Why are you trying to argue with someone who re-defines words on the fly, doesn't even remember her own outrageous claims, and will tell you that hundreds of years of experiment and knowledge are just wrong because she says so? You are talking to the Red Queen here and you cannot win any argument, because she's speaking her own special language.


ETA: Perhaps, being as charitable as possible here, RA is confusing "gamma rays" which can come from cosmic sources, with "cosmic rays" which are indeed highly energetic particles, according to the American Heritage dictionary:

Cosmic Ray:
n.
A stream of ionizing radiation of extraterrestrial origin, consisting chiefly of protons, alpha particles, and other atomic nuclei but including some high-energy electrons, that enters the atmosphere, collides with atomic nuclei, and produces secondary radiation, principally pions, muons, electrons, and gamma rays.

You might also find this link useful. It gives a good explanation of the history of discovery, and the description and processes that produce alpha and beta particles. Gamma rays get a mention-- as ELECTROMAGNETIC radiation-- in the very last paragraph.
http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/nuclear-physics-in-a-nutshell.html