FIRST FREE ENERGY DEVICE REACHES MARKET IN OCTOBER -- The Game Changer is Here

[chessnyt]

The idea of spending what ever the cost for a 1MW e-cat unit "without" the claim results repeated from the March 29, 2011 demonstration, Mr Don Smith may be buying a very expensive "paper weight". I would put this in the same type of venue on purchasing a multi million luxury yacht or home for cash from a magazine, newspaper article or a ten minute YouTube video without you actually physically steping on board or checking out what your getting "first'. 

What happens if you purchase the ROSSI e-cat device and doesn't work ..... do you get your money back ? There's a multitude of excuses that can be used by any inventor when it doesn't work just like we see from every other experimental device, from being installed improperly to sun spots and every excuse in between why it doesn't work.   

Just as I had suspected, another propagandist at work here.  Here, the author tries to instill doubt that there is any warranty or moneyback guarantee.  This clumsy attempt is quite transparent and shaggy (fuzzy).

Now here's the truth to dispel the disinformation presented by the author:
o The man who made the $1 million dollar offer is Dick Smith.  Not Don Smith. 
o Rossi does in fact offer warranties on both the home and the industrial version of the E-Cat.   

"Warranty for functionality is two years with a guaranteed COP of 6, and the plant has an expected life span of 30 years." -- ecat.com (official website for E-Cat products)

For those who want to hear Rossi in his own words, I submit the following link to the video:

Link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ap5s1gTL54M&feature=player_embedded


Chess

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Just as I had suspected, another propagandist at work here.  Here, the author tries to instill doubt that there is any warranty or moneyback guarantee.  This clumsy attempt is quite transparent and shaggy (fuzzy).

Now here's the truth to dispel the disinformation presented by the author:
o The man who made the $1 million dollar offer is Dick Smith.  Not Don Smith. 
o Rossi does in fact offer warranties on both the home and the industrial version of the E-Cat.   

"Warranty for functionality is two years with a guaranteed COP of 6, and the plant has an expected life span of 30 years." -- ecat.com (official website for E-Cat products)

For those who want to hear Rossi in his own words, I submit the following link to the video:

Link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ap5s1gTL54M&feature=player_embedded


Chess

On the money AGAIN, Chess.  Our trolls LURK.  All over the place.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

[fuzzytomcat]

Hello again FTC

I think the real problem here is nothing to do with the proposal so much as with the proposer.  And I'm not at all sure that you represent public opinion - on any level at all.  So.  IF you're inclined to doubt the efficacy of the E-Cat - then I think you must learn to live with those doubts.  I'm reasonably satisfied that - in the fullness of time - our Andrea Rossi will be able to show everyone the benefits without any need to reference that rather sad little address - and its equally sad little owner.

Kindest regards,
Rosie Pose


Bye the Way (BtW) I will also take the trouble to caution Andrea Rossi as to the identity of that owner - lest he be tempted to rely on any of the presentations in that proposal of his.  God forbid that he be conned into thinking that this could be a reliable venue.

Again with the utmost respect,
Rosie Posie pudding and pie

I still see some misunderstanding here ..... 

What gets broadcasted 24/7 "LIVE" ..... I physically have nothing to do with other than pushing the "ON" button in the studio for anyone world wide to show .... their device .... with their camera .... at their location .... using their testing equipment. 

I do not touch their device at all.  What you might be referring to several years ago was only showing 30% of the actual broadcasting station capabilities.

This is just like a TV station with a control room or studio, split screen, fade in fade out or normal stuff .... It's their presentation not mine. I supply the venue and all spelled out on the web site home page. 

http://www.opensourceresearchanddevelopment.org/Home.html

Our commitment to the Open Source Community

We are trying to provide a service for Inventors and Experimentalist a venue for "LIVE" 24/7 streaming broadcasting of their devices or products to the internet. In a effort to give testing, evaluation or research capabilities for some type of verification on claimed operation or function from items for possible further development to the general public or for manufacturing.

The "LIVE" 24/7 streaming broadcast has a interactive "chat room" for viewers to make comments and suggestions to the devices or projects under discussion and evaluation LIVE on web from guests to academics or engineering experts.

The areas of items in discussion to be broadcasted can range from alternative energy, renewable energy, green energy, clean energy, free energy, geothermal, fluid, wind, solar, electronic technology or electrical technology.

Anyone having a project can submit a request to the Station "Executive Producer" to gain access to this station in a producer role to show your device, product or item on a "LIVE" broadcast, using your own web camera and a internet connection at your place of demonstration. Your broadcast will be relayed through this stations Video Control Room to LiveStream and broadcasted streaming over the internet.

Using this approach for verification of "CLAIMS" of devices or products the applicant Inventor or Experimentalist is responsible using their own device, equipment or product for it's functionality to support and further their "CLAIM".

This LIVE evaluation process eliminates those replicators that verify the "CLAIMS" with costly, rare, unique or hand custom made items to purchase for assemblies. This also narrows down "FRAUDULENT" claims having excuses to verifying replicators of them possibly cherry picking or throwing data off construction and many other various problems that may and do arise, this is of course dependent on the item being broadcasted and evaluated.

The stakes today in the world are high, so the responsibility of Success or Failure rides on the Producer applicant that wishes to
SHOW THEIR WARES
"LIVE"

Staying on topic .... if it works "it works" ..... if it doesn't work "it doesn't work" .... plain and simple, and 100% up to the inventor ... period. 

Oh .... and it's a "FREE" service 

FTC

[fuzzytomcat]

On the money AGAIN, Chess.  Our trolls LURK.  All over the place.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

And so are the "SHILLS" ..... but they don't LURK. 

Their here on soap boxes publicizes and praising devices for reasons of self-interest, personal profit, friendship, loyalty and always acting as an enthusiastic member in order to stimulate the participation of others making comments all without merit aimed at the viewing guests. 

FTC

[MileHigh]

Rosemary:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_%28Internet%29

In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory,^[2] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response^[3] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.^[4] The noun troll may refer to the provocative message itself, as in: "That was an excellent troll you posted."

When I make postings they are about the subject matter in the thread and I am trying to make an honest contribution.

So the definition of a troll is not "anybody who disagrees with me" like you are trying to imply.  You are completely wrong and do not call me a troll.

You are definitely trying to make it seem that people that disagree with you are second class citizens and you try to label them as trolls.  Time to stop your gross and disgusting behaviour.

When all evidence is dismissed as 'laughable nonsense' then you're asking us to dismiss the foundations of good science - based as it is on experimental proof.

More like junk science.  You had to put on your blinders and ignore the serious debate that was raging about wet steam vs. dry steam and how you couldn't tell what it was and how hard it was to measure the amount produced and so on.  Every normal person was expecting to see a heat exchanger with cold water in and warm water out.  Between the temperature differential and the flow rate, both easily measurable, you could calculate the output energy.

So why did Rossi put on this smoke and mirrors dog and pony show when all that he had to do was run water through a heat exchanger?   When he did the demo with the industrial version he used big cooling fans and radiators - more ambiguous data.  Why was there a big honking 500 kilowatt electrical generator running during that demo?

How come for many of these demos, instead of it being straightforward and easily measurable, the inventor chooses to do something unusual ambiguous and unclear instead?

The answer is that they know that people like you will gobble it all up anyways and run around with glazed eyes.

MileHigh