another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[TinselKoala]

@eatenbyagrue: NOW do you see?

. In other words our utility supplier both measures and charges for us for a wattage that they compute at 2 200 watts
. every second
. for every minute
. of each of those six hours
. giving a staggering product of 2200 x 60 x 60 x 6 hours being 47 520 000 watts.
. And not only that.  They can also PROVE that the current continued to flow during that entire cooking period.  Their bill is based on evidence.

Wouldn't you like to see Rosemary's electric bill, where she's charged for 47 MEGAWATTS during a six hour period? 47 megaWatts x 6 hours is a staggering 282 MEGAWATT HOURS.... and the price of electricity here is something like 13 cents per kiloWatt-hour, so Rosie's bill would be  0.13 x 282 x 1000 or over 36 thousand dollars.

Of course, the rates in South Africa may be substantially lower. 

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Poynty

You left this out.  Also per Wiki.

where N is the newton, m is the metre, kg is the kilogram, s is the second, Pa is the pascal, and W is the watt. One joule can also be defined as: The work required to move an electric charge of one coulomb through an electrical potential difference of one volt, or one '"coulomb volt" (C·V). This relationship can be used to define the volt.
The work required to produce one watt of power for one second, or one "watt second" (W·s) (compare kilowatt hour). This relationship can be used to define the watt.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joule

Therefore 'time' is implicit.

Rosie

[Magluvin]

Lol Rose  Love the story line with pictures.             

The courage is not too hard to come by. I have some knowledge of things. And most importantly, they have nothing on me.     Im clean, so I can spot dirty.  lol

So I dont have to spend time defending myself.

I need to focus on my project. Ill be around Rose. I think you can handle it from here. Just a lil dusting. 

Mags

[fuzzytomcat]

Rosemary,

You have much, much bigger problems ...

We established "CUT OFF" dates for your NERD RAT published device schematics based on established 12 MARCH 2011 "VIDEO" evidence .....
------------------------------------------------------------------------------


http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg315729/#msg315729      Reply #1117 on: March 17, 2012, 12:45:43 AM



FROM_CONCEPTION_TO_12_MARCH_2011_Q1_x5_NERD_RAT_DEVICE.JPG  ( From DEVICE "Conception" to 12 MARCH 2011 Q1 x5 "NERD RAT" DEVICE SCHEMATIC )

12_MARCH_2011_and_On_Q1_Q2-Q4_NERD_RAT_DEVICE.png   ( COP>INFINITY DEMONSTRATION 12 MARCH 2011 and "ON" Q1 / Q2-Q4 "NERD RAT" DEVICE SCHEMATIC )

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rosemary your schematic in your "correct and completed" papers submitted for PEER REVIEW and possible publication show .....

ROSSI-JOP-1-PDF.pdf     ( Experimental Evidence of a Breach of Unity on Switched Circuit Apparatus )

ROSSI-JOP-2- PDF.pdf    ( Proposed variation to Faraday’s Lines of Force to include a magnetic dipole in its structure )

Both PDF schematics shown and referenced for PEER REVIEW is ....

12_MARCH_2011_and_On_Q1_Q2-Q4_NERD_RAT_DEVICE.png   ( COP>INFINITY DEMONSTRATION 12 MARCH 2011 and "ON" Q1 / Q2-Q4 "NERD RAT" DEVICE SCHEMATIC )

Therefore SCOPE SHOTS and DATA DUMPS for .....

ROSSI-JOP-1-PDF.pdf 

Fig #3    dated 03/02/11    50s    73.8v    (6 battery)
Fig #4    dated 03/02/11    1us    73.3v    (6 battery)
Fig #5    dated 02/09/11    500us    49.5v    (4 battery)
Fig #8    dated 02/16/11    500us    74.1v    (6 battery)

ROSSI-JOP-2- PDF.pdf

Fig #2    dated 03/02/11    50s    73.8v    (6 battery)
Fig #3    dated 03/02/11    1us    73.3v    (6 battery)
Fig #8    dated 03/02/11    2us    62.9v    (5 battery)

AND THIS IS THE CORRECT "NERD RAT COP>INFINITY" DEVICE SCHEMATIC .....

FROM_CONCEPTION_TO_12_MARCH_2011_Q1_x5_NERD_RAT_DEVICE.JPG  ( From DEVICE "Conception" to 12 MARCH 2011 Q1 x5 "NERD RAT" DEVICE SCHEMATIC )


Your papers correct and completed papers submitted for PEER REVIEW and publication show the schematic is "incorrect" your scope shots and data dumps are wrong and the documents ......

ROSSI-JOP-1-PDF.pdf     ( Experimental Evidence of a Breach of Unity on Switched Circuit Apparatus )
ROSSI-JOP-2- PDF.pdf    ( Proposed variation to Faraday’s Lines of Force to include a magnetic dipole in its structure )

These PDF's and content should be withdrawn anywhere and everywhere they are, followed by a retraction by YOU of the mistakes made in your "correct and completed" papers submitted for PEER REVIEW .


Fuzzy


*meow*

[TinselKoala]

I've just done some early testing on that first circuit Fuzzy posted. I'm using a single IRFPG50 mosfet (that's all my supplier had in stock until next week) and a light bulb with 50 ohms cold resistance as a load, both with and without inductors in series. So far, the circuit switches just fine, but I've not been able to get it to oscillate. Even using IRF 530 and 2n7000 mosfets it does not oscillate. I am using a regulated power supply for the source voltage, though. I don't have a lot of batteries or inductors here right now... but that will change.

Note how Rosemary's description of the experimental test in question has changed. Even the numbers have changed.

Everything changes, and yet everything remains the same. Rosemary is the one making outrageous and ignorant claims.... and I am the one who is the villain.

I continue to ROFL out loud.