another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[TinselKoala]

My dear Tinsel Koala,
We all know you for being the champion of the blindingly ignorant and we all appreciate how urgently the public must be prevented from seeing any conclusive battery draw down test that I may be trying to propose.  We therefore concede that if this is the measure of the man - then villain does not cut it as a description.  So.  In a rather roundabout way ... you're right.

Rosie Posie
Pudding and Pie

There you go again, liar. You know that I have proposed, over and over, a simple and easy and unequivocal drawdown test that even YOU could perform adequately within two weeks. You haven't said what you find objectionable about my easy and unequivocal test. But to claim that I am against testing of any kind is just another one of your lies. Anybody reading here can see that I have repeatedly encouraged people to BUILD AND TEST the circuit for themselves. Even you, Rosemary, although from your past performance I doubt if you could handle the measurements and computations. That is why I suggested a test that requires NO measurements and NO computations, but would  be a fair test of your battery charging claim nevertheless.

So stop complaining that I am trying to stop or delay testing. The truth is EXACTLY OPPOSITE from what you claim... as usual.

[TinselKoala]

Could you roll on the floor again? I didnt hear it the first time.   

Mags

25.6 MegaJoules.
47.5 MegaWatts in 6 hours, on her electric bill.

Can you hear it now?

[Rosemary Ainslie]

So you've seen her recent posts with her explanation and her new example calculation. And presumably you endorse them as correct, since you haven't commented negatively about them.

I am ashamed for you. Go and work on your motor, but don't forget.... the BATTERY is the one part of all free energy devices that seems to be absolutely required. Darn it... none of them will run without a battery !!

I would be most reluctant to call you a liar - so will only say that this statement of yours is NOT TRUE.  Our water to boil test measured absolutely NO energy coming from the battery supply.  It's explained in that second paper that you're anxious never to reference.  Which lack of reference is also a critical component to your argument.  LOL.  Better leave it buried behind yours and Glen Lettenmaier's pages and pages of traducement.

Take care of yourself TK.  The tide is turning.  And it may yet be that you'll not be able to retire to that little coastal village in Mexico.  God forbid.

And as ever,
Rosie Posie

[Magluvin]

So you've seen her recent posts with her explanation and her new example calculation. And presumably you endorse them as correct, since you haven't commented negatively about them.

I am ashamed for you. Go and work on your motor, but don't forget.... the BATTERY is the one part of all free energy devices that seems to be absolutely required. Darn it... none of them will run without a battery !!

Ill present this advice to congress, and will implement those ideas when they are finished deliberating.        Should be soon.     Wudaya think?

Mags

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Harti,

I see that you're there.  May I please impose on you to halt the traducements on this thread.  We are anxious to thrash out the conditions required for a final proof of claim - related to battery draw downs.  And every time we attempt a discussion of this TK and Glen and, latterly even MileHigh - dominate the discussion - now in defense of TK.

May I ask you to consider allowing TK and his friends to work their counter arguments on an alternate thread?  That way Poynty and I and Mags can implement the conditions to that test that Mags proposed we run.  Else this will forever be prevented. And that's not in the interests of over unity research.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary