Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

Started by Rosemary Ainslie, November 08, 2011, 09:15:50 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Rosemary Ainslie

Guys, in case you missed this.

The reason that Glen pasted this post - YET AGAIN - is because he's anxious to take the thread away from some rather telling posts.  It's his mandate.  He may post what he likes provided only that he forces the focus away from anything that's significant.  Hopefully you'll have the good sense to apply that scroll function on your computers.  Harti is rather depending on these kind of distractions.  Else why would he allow Glen to post?  It's not as if he ever has anything to say.  And he's trying very hard to ignore the fact that he claims a full on replication of an earlier test but - confusingly - tries to deny this.  What is doubly confusing is that he thinks it would take courage to access some live broadcast number that he's proposing.  He seems to think that I'd ever allow our work to be associated with his name - or lack of it.  Take your pick.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

TinselKoala

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on March 19, 2012, 12:05:49 AM
  You left this out.  Also per Wiki.

where N is the newton, m is the metre, kg is the kilogram, s is the second, Pa is the pascal, and W is the watt. One joule can also be defined as: The work required to move an electric charge of one coulomb through an electrical potential difference of one volt, or one '"coulomb volt" (C·V). This relationship can be used to define the volt.
The work required to produce one watt of power for one second, or one "watt second" (W·s) (compare kilowatt hour). This relationship can be used to define the watt.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joule

Therefore 'time' is implicit.

Rosie

You are talking about things you don't understand. Go ahead, continue. It's really laughable. Show this thread to your "academics". They'll get a kick out of it, I'm sure, especially that part about your electric bill, and your 47.5 megaWatts.

Rosemary Ainslie

Quote from: TinselKoala on March 19, 2012, 12:18:44 AM
I've just done some early testing on that first circuit Fuzzy posted. I'm using a single IRFPG50 mosfet (that's all my supplier had in stock until next week) and a light bulb with 50 ohms cold resistance as a load, both with and without inductors in series. So far, the circuit switches just fine, but I've not been able to get it to oscillate. Even using IRF 530 and 2n7000 mosfets it does not oscillate. I am using a regulated power supply for the source voltage, though. I don't have a lot of batteries or inductors here right now... but that will change.

Note how Rosemary's description of the experimental test in question has changed. Even the numbers have changed.

Everything changes, and yet everything remains the same. Rosemary is the one making outrageous and ignorant claims.... and I am the one who is the villain.

I continue to ROFL out loud.

My dear Tinsel Koala,
We all know you for being the champion of the blindingly ignorant and we all appreciate how urgently the public must be prevented from seeing any conclusive battery draw down test that I may be trying to propose.  We therefore concede that if this is the measure of the man - then villain does not cut it as a description.  So.  In a rather roundabout way ... you're right.

Rosie Posie
Pudding and Pie

Magluvin

Quote from: TinselKoala on March 19, 2012, 12:18:44 AM


I continue to ROFL out loud.

Could you roll on the floor again? I didnt hear it the first time.   ;D

Mags

TinselKoala

Quote from: Magluvin on March 19, 2012, 12:09:07 AM
Lol Rose  Love the story line with pictures.   8) :o 8)         ;) :o 8)

The courage is not too hard to come by. I have some knowledge of things. And most importantly, they have nothing on me.  ;)   Im clean, so I can spot dirty.  lol

So I dont have to spend time defending myself.

I need to focus on my project. Ill be around Rose. I think you can handle it from here. Just a lil dusting.  :-* 8) 8) 8) 8)

Mags

So you've seen her recent posts with her explanation and her new example calculation. And presumably you endorse them as correct, since you haven't commented negatively about them.

I am ashamed for you. Go and work on your motor, but don't forget.... the BATTERY is the one part of all free energy devices that seems to be absolutely required. Darn it... none of them will run without a battery !!