Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

Started by Rosemary Ainslie, November 08, 2011, 09:15:50 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 28 Guests are viewing this topic.

Rosemary Ainslie

And guys,

While this is on my mind - let me explain something about TK's video.  You'll notice that he applied a mere 3 volts or thereby to the circuit while applying 10 volts or thereby from the signal generator.  The components were thereby intended to be 'stacked' that the applied signal would overpower the supply.  This certainly accounted for the entire lack of evidence of an oscillation in the first video.  But it leaves MANY unanswered questions in the second.  My personal opinion is that there's some 'connectivity' in the circuit that's either intentionally or otherwise - not being disclosed.  I cannot - otherwise - reconcile the fact that he gets any oscillation over the circuit components.  Unless he's deliberately routing the signal onto the only inductance available on that entirely undefined inductive load of his.  That would develop a potential difference - at least.  In which case it may explain why the signal waveform reduces.  But there would need to be some path available.  And I can't see this from his circuit.  It's simply not clear how that wiring is done.  That inductor is also on the breadboard that holds the Q-array. 

The other thing that he's trying to 'brush under the carpet' is the fact that his oscillation is never more than NOISE.  He seems to think that this is either robust or continuous.  It's neither.  Certainly NOT as is evident when he CLAIMS that the battery is disconnected. The one thing that was spot on - is that the applied signal over the battery is indeed sensitive to the 'off set'.  And albeit weak - that waveform across the battery was consistent.  But the 'off set' is simply a means by which the signal is applied in conjunction with a potentiometer that can - thereby - add to the resistance.  It's not 'negative' or 'positive' so much as 'higher' or 'lower'.  But INDEED.  That waveform is consistent with what we find.  But it most certainly is NOT possible without an applied signal.  And that signal does NOT need to come from a function generator as he's ALLEGING. 

Anyway.  That's food for thought.  Hopefully TK will make things clearer as time goes by.  I was rather hoping for more force in all that argument of his - and more rigour in that rather sad little summation he offered. I'm rather inclined to think he was trying to trivialise everything.  I think we need some more transparency in his approach - if he's really going to manage a DEBUNK.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

added

Rosemary Ainslie

@Glen Lettenmaier

I would caution you to acknowledge your sources - IF you're going to post over copious copies of information about batteries.  Else you're exposing Harti to unnecessary risk of litigation.

It's one thing to STEAL my paper.  It's an ENTIRELY different thing when you 'carte blanche' steal ownership of anyone else's.  Surely you've got SOME measure of professionalism there?  We'd all be glad to see some evidence of it.

Rosemary

spelling

fuzzytomcat

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on March 13, 2012, 03:15:38 AM
@Glen Lettenmaier

I would caution you to acknowledge your sources - IF you're going to post over copious copies of information about batteries.  Else you're exposing Harti to unnecessary risk of litigation.

It's one thing to STEAL my paper.  It's an ENTIRELY different thing when you 'carte blance' steal ownership of anyone else's.  Surely you've got SOME measure of professionalism there?  We'd all be glad to see some evidence of it.

Rosemary

Reading members and guests,

For the record a re-post that I am now a "THIEF" as shown by Rosemary Ainslie ...... again without any proof of e-mails or forum postings references of the stated allegation only slander !!!!

fuzzytomcat


energy1234hope

Go away troll IT was interesting readiing before you stuck your nose in.