another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

And guys - here's that rather tired and ultimate TROLL JUSTIFICATION.  It's alarming.

Stop wasting your own and other people's time by playing on their naive hopes and wishes.

His efforts here are commendable.  They're not guided so much by a desire to simply STOP the inevitable onward march of new energies from all over the place - they're guided by the overarching requirement to protect you from those such as me who may - wittingly or otherwise - prove the existence of all that energy.  He wishes to disabuse you of your rather naive hopes and dreams for a better future.  He wants to disabuse you of any expectations greater than our energy monopolists manage.  His interventions here are for your own good.  In short - you/we owe him our gratitude.

Otherwise - God knows what will happen.  We'll assume that cold fusion is NOT PIE IN THE SKY - and we may even commit the unpardonable folly of thinking that we can work our electricity bills down to next to nothing.  And that simply by changing the way we apply our electric energy applications.  God forbid.  Because that will most certainly NOT be a good thing.  One must NOT foster unrealistic hopes.  And it really doesn't matter that there's an entire SCHOOL that has PROVED the existence of an abundant energy supply source.  And nor does it matter that we need access to that energy or our lives are going to be horribly curtailed by a confrontation with Nature will most certainly annihilate the most of us.

The thing to do is to silence ME and any rather hopeful evidence that we've garnered.  And that way you can live your lives without hope.  Far more realistic.  And far more in the interests of our energy monopolists.  The last thing that's needed is to change anything at all.  There's some out there who MUCH prefer the status quo - and would MUCH prefer it to let matters stand.  Exactly as they are.  Fortunately TK's there to protect theirs and your best interests.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

[TinselKoala]

Rosemary said:

There it is again.  You don't IMPLY that I'm lying.  You come out and say it.  LOL.  My dear TK.  Wake up.  I'm way too old to waste my life in trivialities.  And 'lies' or 'falsehoods' as you put it - are absolutely not going to add to the quality of my life.  If you want to 'allege' this - then do us all the courtesy of pointing out which falsehoods you're referring to. 

How about this big whopper:

According to what has been carefully established it takes 4.18 Joules to raise 1 gram of water by 1 degree centigrade.  We've taken a little under 900 grams of water to 82 degrees centigrade.  We ran that test for 90 minutes.  Then we upped the frequency and took that water up a further 20 degrees to 104.  We ran that part of the test for 10 minutes.  Ambient was at 16.  Joules = 1 watt per second.  So.  Do the math.  4.18 x 900 grams x (82 - 16) 66 degrees C = 248 292 joules per second x 90 minutes of the test period = 22 342 280 joules.  Then ADD the last 10 minutes where the water was taken to boil and now you have 4.18 x 900 grams x (104 - 16) 88 degrees C = 331 156 joules per second x 10 minutes = 3 310 560 Joules.  Then add those two values 22 342 280 + 3 310 560 = 25.6 Million Joules.  All 5 batteries maximum potential output - available for work - is 10.3 Million Joules. In that test alone the battery outperformed its watt hour rating.

Until you retract the claims made in this statement, which anyone with knowledge can see is based on wrong math and wrong ideas about power and energy..... you are a liar, because you are claiming something that isn't true.

I've been dealing with your casual attitude towards the truth ever since the Naked Scientists forum days, when you lied repeatedly about having a patent, when all you really have is a lapsed patent application which was never granted nor pursued. And anyone who has been reading your statments over the years can think of many more instances when you have "stretched the truth".... like these conflicting statements you have made in this very thread:

"Its a pity though that we cannot get ANY oscillation without the circuit linked to our batteries."

"That oscillation MOST CERTAINLY occurs while the battery is disconnected."

"We have a circuit that generates a ROBUST self-sustaining oscillation that persists for the duration that a battery is entirely disconnected from the circuit."

You're not only a liar but the most inept kind: one with a poor memory.

[TinselKoala]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVljRuPwrtQ

That will have to be the last one for the morning. If anyone _coherent_ can think of another test I can do with what's there, I'll be more or less happy to do it.

[powercat]

Yes TK,
can you do a Polygraph test on Rosemary  most of us know the answer, but you can help those who still believe in Santa.

[fuzzytomcat]

Yes TK,
can you do a Polygraph test on Rosemary  most of us know the answer, but you can help those who still believe in Santa.

NOW THAT"S A TEST !!!!

THE ONLY ONE WITH A GREATER THAN INFINITY RESULT !!!