another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[TinselKoala]

Yes, you are clearly right, and I just hope _somebody_ starts testing _something_ soon.

Somebody other than me, I mean.

By the way, after running my system from 1605 until the mosfet failure at 2010, the load temperature was up to over 96.5 degrees (I saw 98.7 at one point but didn't actually record it). After shutdown I measured the battery voltage with the high-precision Simpson digital multimeter. It was 37.8 volts. The battery voltage was 37.8 volts when I started the test at 1605. Therefore, since the batteries are still "fully charged", I claim COP = INFINITY too, since even now.... hours after shutdown.... my oxtail soup is still hot.

In fact... since my batteries have less than 1/8 the capacity of Rosemary's to start.... I claim COP = 8 x INFINITY.


(Ever watch a rodeo clown at work? It's a very interesting occupation.)

[evolvingape]

In fact... since my batteries have less than 1/8 the capacity of Rosemary's to start.... I claim COP = 8 x INFINITY.


(Ever watch a rodeo clown at work? It's a very interesting occupation.)

Impressive claim, sounds like your in competition with the Energizer Bunny!

RM

[poynt99]

evolvingape,

Clearly you were making an assumption, and it would appear to be incorrect.

Perhaps the first question you SHOULD have asked BEFORE you assumed, was "What is the claim for this drawdown test?", like I did, here:
http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg315662/#msg315662

And Rosemary seems to hint at an answer here:
http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg315692/#msg315692

Therefore, you should conclude that this test is not to prove her circuit yields COP infinity, and that we are aiming to test as I have outlined, pending agreement from Rosemary.

[poynt99]

TK,

That was probably a combination of too much offset, and thermal runaway. Interestingly, Rosemary has mentioned a similar occurance.

(Yes, MOSFETs too can exhibit thermal runaway).

[Rosemary Ainslie]

TK,

That was probably a combination of too much offset, and thermal runaway. Interestingly, Rosemary has mentioned a similar occurance.

(Yes, MOSFETs too can exhibit thermal runaway).

Thermal runaway as it's associated with MOSFETs is accounted for by an increase in current flow.  We have had absolutely NO change in our waveform over the MOSFETs which waveforms indicate that there is  NO INCREASE IN CURRENT FLOW.  Nor have OUR transistors been unduly stressed.   The difference between our claim and that of TK's is that we have the waveform downloads to prove this.

Poynty Point - do NOT try and negate the evidence by diminishing it's significance.  That's TK's technique.  And you see for yourself that it doesn't work. 

Kindest regards,
Rosie Pose