another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[TinselKoala]

I posted this scopeshot and asked, "Where did this come from, I wonder." This is Rosie Poser's reply:

You ASK?  You found it after an extensive search because you are rather reluctant to reference our official claim - detailed as it is in our paper.  Our claim is ONLY associated with our paper.  NOT with that video.  Surely you know that?  Or has this fact entirely eluded you TK?  In which case it seems that your language competence is as compromised as Glen Lettenmaier's.  I'll see if I can use simple words in future.

Rosie Pose

OH REALLY !!!

So this scope shot.... which you say I "found after an extensive search because you" (meaning TK) "are rather reluctant to reference our official claim - detailed as it is in our paper " represents your actual claim, then, does it?

[TinselKoala]

I'm sorry, but this is getting to be too much like poking sticks through the bars of the cage of some poor trapped animal. Rosemary cannot get away from her "thesis" and her device because she's pathologically attached to it. It's like a cage that she can't escape. Within the cage she's the mistress, she can bite or claw at you, spit and hiss, piss on herself in frenzy like she did over the video,which of course contains her claim and her circuit and her methodology. But she can't get out of the cage, can't get away to "kill two birds with one stone" as she says.
Every poke draws a little blood, she gets more frantic and continues to thrash and flail about. But after a while it gets boring and even seems a little cruel, to be taking advantage of her captivity this way. Besides, the noise from her caterwauling starts to grate; her snide remarks and hypocrisy are like the vile odors rising from piss-soaked fur, coupled with the stench of mendacity as she tries to wheedle and wiggle out of the glare of the light and reach of the stick.

Test? TEST?? With TROLLS around? Never. And anybody who dares question her is, by definition, a TROLL.

There will never be any real testing from Rosemary (and we've all known this from the beginning) ..... because she herself knows how the test will turn out, and then it will really be all over. She cannot face that! And this must be the last forum available to her for discussion. She's used them all up, and any new ones in this field will surely know about good old OU dot com and Rosemary's history.

(Notice how the replicators are coming out of the woodwork NOT ... here's a device which, if one could only locate the actual proper circuit diagram, can be built with less than 50 dollars worth of parts (or 20 if you don't believe in magic mosfets and can use the 830a instead) and is guaranteed by the poser to produce COP INFINITY. Yet all these people on this site are building Besseler Wheels and MEGs and one-coil motors and things like that when they could have a COP INFINITY device put together on their workbench in half an hour and start testing it and charging their batteries and making oxtail soup. Why doesn't anybody else build and test Rosemary's device?

Why do you think I call it the Tar Baby?)

[TinselKoala]

Compare the two circuit diagrams shown below. The one "without" the pretty blue border is the one that Rosemary has had us discussing for most of this thread, ever since .99 and others analyzed the video. This is the circuit diagram that is used in Tar Baby, and makes no sense for a couple of reasons.
The one WITH the pretty blue border is copy-pasted directly from the "paper" that Rosie Poser says contains her claims. I added the blue background and the captions, nothing else.

Note the difference. This subtle difference removes one of the reasons that "makes no sense", in that it puts the HEAVY LOAD onto the stack of 4 mosfets instead of having it carried by the single Q1 during the "high heat" mode where the circuit is carrying several amps of current. The blue border diagram finally manages to share this load among the Gang of Four.

And this is why the "paper's" circuit can be said to be "different" from the one in the video.

In other words..... it is again an example of obfuscation, error, and mendacity on the part of RA, who is supposed to have an OPEN SOURCE, shared information project going on here.

Fine. This is an easy modification for the experimenters and replicators to make.  For Tar Baby it just involves pulling the mosfets... sorry, MOSFETs out of their sockets, turning them all around, and adding a bit of wire length to the Q1 leads, since the existing ones are very short. Will it make a difference in performance? Yes.... the Q1 mosfet will be less likely to fail, since now it will "never" really be loaded: in the low heat mode it will just oscillate, passing minuscule current, and in the high heat mode it is out of the circuit entirely and could just as well be removed. Will it turn Tar Baby into a NERD? We shall see.

Had they used THIS circuit in the video instead of the one that they actually accidentally did use, they could have used the full 60 or maybe even 72 volts for the high heat mode, and that would have been much more impressive than the unexplained removal of one battery to lower the voltage (and thus the current through the lone mosfet) to safe levels.

[fuzzytomcat]

Compare the two circuit diagrams shown below. The one "without" the pretty blue border is the one that Rosemary has had us discussing for most of this thread, ever since .99 and others analyzed the video. This is the circuit diagram that is used in Tar Baby, and makes no sense for a couple of reasons.
The one WITH the pretty blue border is copy-pasted directly from the "paper" that Rosie Poser says contains her claims. I added the blue background and the captions, nothing else.

Note the difference. This subtle difference removes one of the reasons that "makes no sense", in that it puts the HEAVY LOAD onto the stack of 4 mosfets instead of having it carried by the single Q1 during the "high heat" mode where the circuit is carrying several amps of current. The blue border diagram finally manages to share this load among the Gang of Four.

And this is why the "paper's" circuit can be said to be "different" from the one in the video.

In other words..... it is again an example of obfuscation, error, and mendacity on the part of RA, who is supposed to have an OPEN SOURCE, shared information project going on here.

Fine. This is an easy modification for the experimenters and replicators to make.  For Tar Baby it just involves pulling the mosfets... sorry, MOSFETs out of their sockets, turning them all around, and adding a bit of wire length to the Q1 leads, since the existing ones are very short. Will it make a difference in performance? Yes.... the Q1 mosfet will be less likely to fail, since now it will "never" really be loaded: in the low heat mode it will just oscillate, passing minuscule current, and in the high heat mode it is out of the circuit entirely and could just as well be removed. Will it turn Tar Baby into a NERD? We shall see.

Had they used THIS circuit in the video instead of the one that they actually accidentally did use, they could have used the full 60 or maybe even 72 volts for the high heat mode, and that would have been much more impressive than the unexplained removal of one battery to lower the voltage (and thus the current through the lone mosfet) to safe levels.

Hey TK,

All the experimentalist, members and guests have been "DUPED" again .....

The papers that were sent out to accredited journals or magazines for possible peer review and publication by the NERD RAT team have two different device schematics ....

Experimental Evidence of a Breach of Unity on Switched Circuit Apparatus   ( ROSSI-JOP-1-PDF.pdf )
ROSSI-JOP-1-PDF_Q2_x4_Q1_.PNG

Proposed variation to Faraday’s Lines of Force to include a magnetic dipole in its structure   ( ROSSI-JOP-2- PDF.pdf )
ROSSI-JOP-2-PDF_Q1_Q2_x4_.PNG


As you can see Q1 / Q2 x4 is flip flopped or reversed in ROSSI-JOP-1-PDF_Q2_x4_Q1_.PNG .... and .... ROSSI-JOP-2-PDF_Q1_Q2_x4_.PNG 

WTF is going on here ?? Why have we been not informed by the NERD RAT team and or Rosemary Ann Ainslie of this "HUGE" difference in the device schematics ?? This is on the verge of being criminal !! 

FTC

[TinselKoala]

Is stupidity criminal?