another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[picowatt]

.99,

I would interpret Rosemary's response in a similar way.  It would, however, eliminate all ambiguity if Rosemary would confirm that the schematic in the first paper (Exp Evidence...) is indeed the correct one.

PW

[Rosemary Ainslie]

.99,

I would interpret Rosemary's response in a similar way.  It would, however, eliminate all ambiguity if Rosemary would confirm that the schematic in the first paper (Exp Evidence...) is indeed the correct one.

PW

Hello picowatt

Not sure why you need me to answer this when Poynty's reply and reference covers the question.  But far be it from me to deny you and Glen and TK the opportunity to fill this thread with another five pages of erroneous discussion.  I'm sure that you can none of you help yourselves.  It seems that the compulsive need to repeat everything is parceled with this same compulsive need to deny efficacy.  What's particularly intriguing is that this thread seems to be getting an average of 5000 hits a day.  Clearly our readers find your questions and answers as entertaining as I do.  Which just goes to show.  Even our trolls have their value. 

Rosie Pose 

[picowatt]

Rosemary,

It would seem to be much easier for you to just state, "yes, paper one is correct" than all that "commentary".

What on Earth did I do to deserve that response?

PW

[fuzzytomcat]

Hello picowatt

Not sure why you need me to answer this when Poynty's reply and reference covers the question.  But far be it from me to deny you and Glen and TK the opportunity to fill this thread with another five pages of erroneous discussion.  I'm sure that you can none of you help yourselves.  It seems that the compulsive need to repeat everything is parceled with this same compulsive need to deny efficacy.  What's particularly intriguing is that this thread seems to be getting an average of 5000 hits a day.  Clearly our readers find your questions and answers as entertaining as I do.  Which just goes to show.  Even our trolls have their value. 

Rosie Pose 

So little miss "SUPER TROLL" ... Rosie Posie ...

So the device schematic from paper 2 ( ROSSI-JOP-2- PDF.pdf ) is wrong and the "correct" device schematic is in paper 1 ( ROSSI-JOP-1-PDF.pdf ) a typo you say.

The device schematic in paper 2 ( ROSSI-JOP-2- PDF.pdf ) the same device schematic posted in your "SUPER TROLL'S' BLOG site http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/2011/04/109-simulated-circuit.html ( Simulation Schematic.jpg ) ( ROSSI-JOP-2-PDF_Q1_Q2_x4_.PNG ) were these device schematics used at "ALL" in your papers 1 & 2 or some other testing of yours anywhere ?

Yes or No ?? 

Is that "ONE" question to hard now ....

CHEERS,
FTC

[TinselKoala]

Basic FG offset function:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoYFxq4bm2w

You all have no idea how hard it is to fake this stuff. I had to use CGI and a room full of renderers to pull this one off.


OH... it's almost six am. I've got to hurry.... it's almost time for me to reset the ROSIE TEST PREVENTION broadcast device, which radiates Tesla technology longitudinal scalar waves that keep Rosemary from thinking coherently and performing a TEST of her batteries for yet another day. I'm going to be boosting the power soon, though, so that a single linecast will prevent her from testing for an entire week.

(The grubby nails are because I spent literally _all day_ Friday replacing my car's air conditioning system. I vacuumed the residual R-22 out, replaced the compressor, condenser, accumulator, orifice tube with new parts, flushed the evaporator and hoses with dl-limonene followed by compressed air, replaced the  highside switch, the compressor-mounted switch and all the Schreder valves, all the o-rings, changed the fittings to R-134a standard, vacuumed out the system for a couple of hours with a 2-stage pump, recharged with 8 oz oil and 32 oz R-134a--- and now I have blissfully cold air blowing out the airholes in the cabin. And I still found time to re-actuate the PoserPreventer.)