another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[TinselKoala]

@MH: You are confusing me with all these LEDs. Could you please draw a diagram for me? I've got lots of red and green LEDs to blow up and I like doing it.

@.99: I am glad the sim sees the limiting of the voltage that the gate driver puts out.... If I am understanding you correctly this happens in the real circuit too, it's what I've been calling "draw down" as if the FG were heavily loaded by a low impedance load. However, increasing the amplitude of the FG output at this point causes an increase in _current_ but not voltage. And I think Rosemary's Instek is doing this too, based on the reports and scope traces.

Meanwhile, back at the ranch..... What's that, Lassie? Timmy is stuck in the well..... again ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkIKGf_2bt0

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rosemary:

I stand corrected.  The circuit is using the "potential only" from the batteries so they are not discharging while the load resistor is heated.  I believe I got it right now?

With respect to the current flowing counter-clockwise, for what seems like the hundredth time I will state it again:  What you are seeing on the CSR is indeed an AC voltage and current waveform.  So there is what appears to be some current flowing counter-clockwise.  However, it is not the battery current.  Please study the attached diagram again.

MileHigh

What's to study MileHigh?  What you're inferring is as obvious as a slap.  Where you 'error' - as it's referred to - is the ASSUMPTION that the current sensing resistor is where you've put it.  It IS there in the demo vid.  It is NOT there in the tests relating to our paper.  This point of yours is as repetitive as your need to keep referring to my claims related to batteries recharging.  Both you and TK harp on and on and on about points that have been put to bed WAAAY back.  AGAIN.  There are 7 of us collaborators.  We all are responsible for the facts in those papers of ours.  And we ALL concur that the CSR is NOT where you've shown it.  But again.  I'm not sure if you want the facts or if you're just anxious to keep showing us all those pretty arrows of yours.  Whichever.  Feel free.  Do as you feel needs must.  It's just that you seem to assume that our readers have as short an attention span as you.  Or you assume that - like you - they never read my answers.  I sincerely hope that your assumptions are wrong. 

Rosie Pose

[TinselKoala]

 

There is NOT ONE RELIABLE COMPUTATION ON THIS FORUM THAT HAS EVER BEEN MANAGED BY POYNTY, PROFESSOR STEVEN E JONES, TINSEL KOALA - OR ANY OF THEM.   And, frankly, I've had a belly full.

Can you believe this ignorant arrogance? If I didn't know the source, I'd say it was impossible for a human being intelligent enough to use a computer to get stuff SO SCREWED UP that she doesn't even see the difference between 1 Watt = 1 Joule per second, and 1 Joule = 1 Watt per second (sic).


@MH: Thanks for the Easter Egg ! Can you put in your exact LED proposal too please? I'm having a lot of fun here, refuting Rosemary point by point by point all along the line.


@Rosemary: Your seven collaborators: Contact information please. Your raw data: make it available for inspection please.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

@MH: You are confusing me with all these LEDs. Could you please draw a diagram for me? I've got lots of red and green LEDs to blow up and I like doing it.

@.99: I am glad the sim sees the limiting of the voltage that the gate driver puts out.... If I am understanding you correctly this happens in the real circuit too, it's what I've been calling "draw down" as if the FG were heavily loaded by a low impedance load. However, increasing the amplitude of the FG output at this point causes an increase in _current_ but not voltage. And I think Rosemary's Instek is doing this too, based on the reports and scope traces.

Meanwhile, back at the ranch..... What's that, Lassie? Timmy is stuck in the well..... again ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkIKGf_2bt0

LOL.  That would be a miracle of some considerable proportions.  Golly.  We now have the advent of current flow that is entirely unrelated to voltage.  And the joke is that I'm the one accused of introducing new science concepts.  If there was any basis of truth is this proposal then I assure you that over unity is a doddle - compared to this claim.  Guys - our TK is branching out into new physics which he's trying impose on us with the same abandon as he imposes his definitions of Alpha rays.  Perhaps he should go back to the wiki definition and look up inductive laws.  With luck it will be as badly explained as alpha emissions.  Then he can, indeed, invent his new standard for our standard model.  What a joke.

Rosemary

[poynt99]

Meanwhile, back at the ranch..... What's that, Lassie? Timmy is stuck in the well..... again ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkIKGf_2bt0

TK,

You're simply a veritable circuit-building, video-producing churning MACHINE.