another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[picowatt]

TK,

Although I appreciate your assistance, I was hoping Rosemary and I could have a quiet discussion regarding the points raised.  Surely she has a copy of her paper and the FIG 3 I have been referencing.

I would like to resolve the value readings with her regarding the LeCroy as that is the the scope used in the captures discussed.

But thank-you for your efforts,
PW

[TinselKoala]

Rosemary, just considering that very brief portion of the rectangular gate drive pulse that is at its highest value, and not oscillating.... is that portion of the signal DC, or not? I'm talking about a single pulse, just the highest portion, that straight line that persists until the signal drops again and oscillates. DC, or not?

[TinselKoala]

TK,

Althouh I appreciate your assistance, I was hoping Rosemary and I could have a quiet discussion regarding the points raised.  Surely she has a copy of her paper and the FIG 3 I have been referencing.

I would like to resolve the value readings with her regarding the LeCroy as that is the the scope used in the captures discussed.

But thank-you for your efforts,
PW

OK, I get the message. Have fun. But you are travelling down a well worn and rocky path that leads nowhere.

[picowatt]

Rosemary,

The scope captures discussed were from your papers.  I do not understand how you can think in any way that discussions related to values indicated by those captures are of little value to you or replicators.

The discussions related to values indicated are only "circular" as you say, because you disagree with how I am reading the captures.

I believe this began when I stated that the channel 3 trace in FIG 3 was at +12.5 volts during the portion of the cycle wherein the function generator output is a positive voltage, and I continue to stand by that statement.

PW 

[fuzzytomcat]

Howdy members and guests,

After the repeated requests for Donovan Martin's input the main known NERD RAT collaborator in the two papers or manuscripts Rosemary submitted to accredited journals or magazines for possible peer review and publication. I couldn't believe how fast that sharp shovel of Rosemary's with dirt a flying everywhere and went to bury my post under her eighteen (18) in a row postings .... some kind of Rosemary's weird cryptic shorthand script which on it's face is really disturbing the context of the posts. 

http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg316652/#msg316652
http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg316653/#msg316653
http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg316654/#msg316654
http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg316656/#msg316656
http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg316657/#msg316657
http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg316658/#msg316658
http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg316659/#msg316659
http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg316660/#msg316660
http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg316661/#msg316661
http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg316662/#msg316662
http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg316663/#msg316663
http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg316664/#msg316664
http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg316665/#msg316665
http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg316666/#msg316666
http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg316667/#msg316667
http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg316668/#msg316668
http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg316669/#msg316669
http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg316670/#msg316670


The problem now after speed reading many of her postings or reply's I found a answer to a question asked about the open source community needing to talk to him as he was the only one that is listed on the newly submitted COP>INFINITY NERD RAT papers with a known engineering background familiar with electronics and has worked with Rosemary on the Quantum 2002 article claiming a COP>17 device in February 2009. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Experimental Evidence of a Breach of Unity on Switched Circuit Apparatus                              ( ROSSI-JOP-1-PDF.pdf )
Rosemary Ainslie, Donovan Martin, Evan Robinson, Mario Human, Alan Macey, Riaan Theron

Proposed variation to Faraday’s Lines of Force to include a magnetic dipole in its structure  ( ROSSI-JOP-2- PDF.pdf )
Rosemary Ainslie, Donovan Martin, Evan Robinson, Mario Human, Alan Macey, Riaan Theron
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The answer why we haven't heard was directed to Poynt99 and not fully explained or reiterated again to the open source community ever even though it's been asked numerous times by other members and myself. The other thing which seems very dishonest, misleading and misrepresented to everyone is Donovan Martin's name as a "AUTHOR" on both papers ..... 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.overunity.com/10407/rosemary-ainslie-circuit-demonstration-on-saturday-march-12th-2011/msg286294/#msg286294                         Reply #1266 on: May 13, 2011, 08:33:35 PM

Poynty - Donny is NOT working on this.  He's working on other things. His time spent on this subject is very constrained. He'll only be able to concentrate time on this subject when we get formal research funding. He has a young family to support and works 24/7 on his own inventions that are absolutely cutting edge.  Mostly related to improvements on traditional energy savings and water savings.  But as in most 'new technologies' he has to forge all kinds of software and suchlike to get it all going.But he absolutely CANNOT afford time on something as radical as our tests because they do not YET carry enough credibility to afford research funding.  When they do - then he'll come to the party full time.  It's his passion.  But he does not believe in the value of forums although he believes in Open Source.  Not many do believe in the value of forums.  And considering my own history - it's probably a fair concern.  I only stick to it because I believe dialogue has a way of getting to those fundamental issues as well as a means of spreading the word.

Kindest again,
Rosie
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It appears to me that Donovan Martin's name was added to the papers in a attempt to give them some kind of blanket credibility but that cant be true at all when he didn't even work on the COP>INFINITY project in any way shape or form. No wonder he has been a "NO" show at the OU forum and impossible to reach through e-mails for comments on the device, testing and evaluation he did .... there wasn't any he did just students at CUPT in South Africa. I guess a claim of a COP>INFINITY wasn't good enough for Donovan Martin unless it had cash attached to it.

Cheers,
FTC