another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[TinselKoala]

Beatings, bleatings....

[poynt99]

Maybe this will help explain the "ofs" utilized by LeCroy?

ETA: First diagram had an error. Now corrected.

[fuzzytomcat]

Howdy members and guests,

After my posting with the proof that Donovan Martin was not involved with the NERD RAT group of expert collaborators in the two papers or manuscripts Rosemary submitted to accredited journals or magazines for possible peer review and publication. http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg318446/#msg318446   Reply #2102 on: Today at 02:31:43 AM

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Experimental Evidence of a Breach of Unity on Switched Circuit Apparatus                              ( ROSSI-JOP-1-PDF.pdf )
Rosemary Ainslie, Donovan Martin, Evan Robinson, Mario Human, Alan Macey, Riaan Theron

Proposed variation to Faraday’s Lines of Force to include a magnetic dipole in its structure  ( ROSSI-JOP-2- PDF.pdf )
Rosemary Ainslie, Donovan Martin, Evan Robinson, Mario Human, Alan Macey, Riaan Theron
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So in the interest of finding information on the testing and evaluation done on Rosemary's device with a claim of COP>INFINITY from possibly a collaborator that is listed as a "AUTHOR" with some kind of electronics background that could be contacted.

The next "AUTHOR" of the NERD RAT group of expert collaborators in the two papers or manuscripts Rosemary submitted to accredited journals or magazines for possible peer review and publication is Evan Robinson whom as a author and contributor to the research and development to find him and get his comments and maybe some answers to our questions from members here at OU .

PUBLIC RECORDS OBTAINED THROUGH "GOOGLE" - Evan Robinson
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://mygeni.org/view/weblink.mygeni?wid=1590&back=view%2Fuser.mygeni%3Fid%3D2%26ig%3D923     ( EvanRobinson_001_001.JPG )

http://mygeni.org/view/video.mygeni?vid=407&back=view%2Fuser.mygeni%3Fid%3D2%26ig%3D923          ( EvanRobinson_001_002.JPG )

http://www.siliconcape.com/profile/EvanRobinson?xg_source=activity                                                         ( EvanRobinson_001_003.JPG )

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Ainslie

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I will be diverting some of my attention to contacting "Evan Robinson" possibly other members may also feel free to contact him now that we know that Donovan Martin had no input in the testing and evaluation with the NERD RAT device with a claim of COP>INFINITY and group of expert collaborators in the two papers or manuscripts Rosemary submitted to accredited journals or magazines for possible peer review and publication. I'm also looking for the other collaborators for their possible input here.


Cheers,
FTC

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Guys I'll do my best to answer this new slew of posting - but for now, and for the record - POYNTY?  WHAT ARE YOU THINKING?  I sort of expected you, at least, to do a correct analysis - OR - not engage at all.  You're endorsing a whole load of nonsense.  WHY?

But I'll explain.  Meanwhile - rest assured - there has never been a more comprehensive misrepresentation of the functions of that little LeCroy EVER.  More's the pity.  And I'm not sure that I can explain it with the correct terminology.  And it's way too early to get any of my friends to correct it.  So.  I'll give it  my best shot.

Regards
Rosemary

[poynt99]

Guys I'll do my best to answer this new slew of posting - but for now, and for the record - POYNTY?  WHAT ARE YOU THINKING?  I sort of expected you, at least, to do a correct analysis - OR - not engage at all.  You're endorsing a whole load of nonsense.  WHY?

But I'll explain.  Meanwhile - rest assured - there has never been a more comprehensive misrepresentation of the functions of that little LeCroy EVER.  More's the pity.  And I'm not sure that I can explain it with the correct terminology.  And it's way too early to get any of my friends to correct it.  So.  I'll give it  my best shot.

Regards
Rosemary

Rosemary,

I'd be interested to hear what your experts say of my explanation. You could print the annotated scope shot out or email it to them.

What is your objection to the annotated scope shot Rosemary?