SMOT

[FreeEnergy]

here is something kind of like it.
http://www.diac.com/~ekwall2/ffsmot

[hartiberlin]

Well done,
but the ramps are much too small.
You need at least a 1 Meter ramp with at least a gain or 20 cm in height
to overcome all the frictions involved.
These small ramps with only a height gain of 1 inch (2.5 cms or so) do not make any sense.

With iron plates face to face into the ramp you can use less
magnets.
So each side ramp stator side will then have 2 iron plates !
this makes the fields also more equal inside the ramp and
then the ball can be sucked up into more height and can
also better dropped.

It all depends on the field setup inside the ramp.

Also at the end to turn the iron plates by 90 degrees above the
ramp gives a much easier exit as Greg Watson has shown
in his recent ramp magnet field simulations.


Regards, Stefan.

[PaulLowrance]

I take the following post very seriously.

I just wanted to warn everyone that IMHO this SMOT is either a scam or people are really wasting their time.  I am firm believer in free energy research but this is one of the worst and most obvious designs I have ever seen.  This is so obvious that I can only conclude this is an attempt to waist the time of legitimate researchers.

Please read the thread:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Prometheus_Effect/message/233

In the thread I offer two valid tests to see if this is free energy.

After studying this Prometheus Effect, here are my two conclusions:

1. I am 100% certain that the ball dropped straight down will experience more friction loss than the ball that dropped with more horizontal velocity.
2. I am very certain, not 100%, that there is no free energy in this SMOT or Prometheus Effect.

If I am wrong then I would be more than happy to be quiet and sit down.  I see videos dated back to 1999.  I am told the only people who claim over unity never revealed their secret designs.  Additionally I see posts as such,

"If you would make a few movies of the rotational device, so one could see for clear, that it is no fake and postthis widely on the Internet, you will get instantaneously much interest in it and will also ATTRACT MUCH RESEARCH MONEY to develop it further."

Sincerely,
Paul

[hartiberlin]

Paul,
you simply ignore the facts...
You just don?t have studied it enough when we
did study it already in 1999.

I agree, that it would better to have a longer much
higher ramp to see the effect much better or have Greg shown
his closed loop device.

Regards, Stefan.

[FreeEnergy]

here is a video