SMOT

[Light]

"pinobot, If You are not one of the ignorant liers, You will now
provide factual explanation to me and others why do you think that this is not most advanced SMOT ever made...please comment it...Where are You all?".
-  There's nothing to comment. Dead duck. One magnet will hit another, both will move a little bit further, and that's it. Both sit dead. Try if anybody want. I did. Just for fan. Nothing. And can't be.

[wizkycho]

"pinobot, If You are not one of the ignorant liers, You will now
provide factual explanation to me and others why do you think that this is not most advanced SMOT ever made...please comment it...Where are You all?".
- There's nothing to comment. Dead duck. One magnet will hit another, both will move a little bit further, and that's it. Both sit dead. Try if anybody want. I did. Just for fan. Nothing. And can't be.

sorry for "strong" words but just telling it wan't work without any fact to go with that conclusion...

exp. Your magnets are to close to a ball and/or your magnets are too short 25 to 30 cm 5mm thick requiered (NdFeB).
Why NdFeB ? is a must - so you can make sufficient distance between ball and magnets and still have enough "room" to widen entrance of SMOT and make neccesery mag flux gradinet change that still interacts with ball that enters.

[FreeEnergy]

video

[Light]

"telling it wan't work without any fact"
- It is a fact. I never tell anything before i try(but people here do), of course when it make sense...

"...is a must"
- Maybe, but to run a system we need a solid impact (to transfer the impulse), not a soft, as it take place on your scheme.
The stronger magnets the stronger force that does not allow to separate the magnets.

[Limoman7]

I just posted in the Finsrud section , did not know there was a SMOT diicussion in Mag Mtrs.

I've read all 9 pages..... Am I right in assuming that no one has gotten a SMOT to circulate more that a couple of times?

My design is very much like a SMOT but the magnets are arranged a bit diiferent.

Fiirst off to the guy that thinks the SMOT is a waste of time.

I am just a regular guy not a scientist or even an avid researcher. I enjoy reading about and "Tinkering" with the idea of
perpetual motion and free energy when I have free time. Instead of reading novels or crossword puzzels I spend my free time on OU & FE.

At first I was thinking of building a Bedini Mtr but after reading about the SMOT I was hooked. It seemed very easy to understand and more importantly cheap to build.


SMALL STEPS... thats how I work.

I first built a SMOT according to Greg's plans.. It worked just like he said it would. I used U-Channel stock as my track.
In my first tests I could get the ball brg to climb right up and exit the ramp onto the table. I thought I really had something there but what I did not take into account was the U-Channel was about a 3/4" tall, so did I really gain that much having the ball brg land on the table? I think I could get the same results or very close just by raising the ramp 3/4" and letting the ball roll off the end.

What I need to do is start on a flat plane and end up on the same plane with some forward motion. Breaking past the magnetic gate wiith momentum was my goal.

I'll let you know as to my progress.


Cheers!