SMOT

[PaulLowrance]

Greg,

Why do you simply copy the same message and post it in numerous places?  This is the FOURTH place you have posted this exact same message.  Are you OK?

Again, here is my reply:

+++++++++++
Greg,

"prometheus_effect" <prometheus_effect@y...> wrote:
> > there is no way in this world you are or anyone is going to
> > beat me by getting me to waist valuable time and money building
> > this machine.
>
> Beat you? At what? Making a OU device? You lost that round in 1997
> when I published the SMOT plans.

You don't seem to understand? I have clearly stated that IMHO the SMOT & so-called prometheus effect project is a distraction. So if I am convinced the SMOT and prometheus effect are false then why would I allow myself to build the machine when others have already done so. If I allowed myself to fall victim to your distraction then I would be beaten.
Cast doubt? Well, it seems I am the one who is offering science and math at your Yahoo forum. On numerous occasions I have challenged anyone to find error in my math or step-by-step process-- still no takers. I have asked you repeatedly for this so-called document that contains proof. Still to this day you have not point to the exact location of this document. You would have to know that I would find any errors in such a document if they existed.

I lost the round in 1997, Greg???  I just found out about the SMOT & so-called prometheus effect just recently this year, as in about a month or so ago.  Don't you recall?  You were the one who came to the Yahoo Group forum that Sterling so kindly created for me and you attempted to bring it down by false science claims.  You tried to find error in my research and you failed miserably.  Don't you recall the major mistake you made in the permeability & RL time constant-- how I so clearly pointed out your error?  That's how I found out about the so-called prometheus effect.  It would seem that you are the one who lost the round Greg on my forum and also back in 1997 when you claimed a looping SMOT.  Many people including Stephan talk about your old claims of looping the SMOT.  So if you had the smoking gun 8 years ago Greg, then what happened?  Can you in good conscience take these poor people another 8 years?  I'll pray tonight that these people will see the truth in you.



> By the way Paul, flux gate motors are not OU.

BTW Greg, I never said flux gate motors are OU. You are the one who
believes in Over Unity. I have repeatedly claimed that I am not a
follower of OU, but rather I prefer to use the term Free Energy.  Please quote me!  I'll be waiting.



> > I am here to discuss with anyone factual data, any
> > step-by-step processes, and to help these people see the "the
> > light."
>
> See what "Light"? The "Light" of YOUR theories? Who appointed you or
> even asked you to do this? How dare you insult the intelligence of
> the other list members by talking down to them like this.

So you think that it should be a dictatorship society? That people
cannot come to your prometheus_effect forum to offer math and step-by-step processes to disprove you?



> If your time is so pressed, then maybe you should stop wasting it in
> this forum and show the world how you can make a OU flux gate motor.

Please by all means show these people where I stated the flux gate motor is OU? You are the one who believes in OU. I have clearly stated many times that I am not a follower of OU but rather free energy.  There is a vast difference. I think you are now grasping at straws to the point of trying to put words in my mouth. You put words in my mouth without quoting me.  I'll be waiting and will remind you of it.

I think your days are coming to an end Greg.  People are now posting your 8-year-old posts.  Even people such as Joe are now questioning you.  My motives are to help people free themselves with Truth.  I am not trying to judge you.  Believe me Greg, there is a far greater judge then I!!!

Wasting my time?  I think about the well being of other people Greg. Do you understand getting past the Me Me Me stage?  Why do so many people in modern society have such difficulty with being of service to others; i.e., getting past the "Me" stage, spending ones time helping others.  I have signed up for numerous local projects to help the community.  It's called Unconditional Love.  It's called being spiritual.  It's called being a good person.  It's called Pure Logic.  Even the character portrayed in Star Trek known as Spoke said while sacrificing his life to others, "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few."

Sincerely,
Paul

[prometheus_effect]

Guys,

I would like to enlist the aid of some of the members of the
OU / Free Energy community to independently verify the
virtually no magnetic dragback exit of the Prometheus Effect.
To that end I will provide a SMOT device and the new lossless
measurement system at no cost. In return you will be asked
to do a series of measurement on the SMOT device and report
back your results & comments either way. The SMOT device
and the measurement system will be yours to keep.

To that end I would like to ask the following for their so kind assistance:

1) Bill Beaty (Vortex)
2) Scott Little or Hal Puthoff (Vortex)
3) Jed Rothwell (Vortex)
4) Terry Blanton (Vortex)
5) Keith Nagel (Vortex)
6) Jean-Louis Naudin (JLN Labs)
7) Stefan Hartman (Overunity.com)
8) Cyril Smith (OU Builders)
9) David Squires (OU Builders)

Now it's just engineering effort, time and money,
Greg

[hartiberlin]

Okay Greg, sounds good.
Let me know, when you have it ready.I will
then post a video of my measurements.

Regards, Stefan

[PaulLowrance]

I would like to enlist the aid of some of the members of the
OU / Free Energy community to independently verify the
virtually no magnetic dragback exit of the Prometheus Effect.
To that end I will provide a SMOT device and the new lossless
measurement system at no cost. In return you will be asked
to do a series of measurement on the SMOT device and report
back your results & comments either way. The SMOT device
and the measurement system will be yours to keep.

To that end I would like to ask the following for their so kind assistance:

1) Bill Beaty (Vortex)
2) Scott Little or Hal Puthoff (Vortex)
3) Jed Rothwell (Vortex)
4) Terry Blanton (Vortex)
5) Keith Nagel (Vortex)
6) Jean-Louis Naudin (JLN Labs)
7) Stefan Hartman (Overunity.com)
Cyril Smith (OU Builders)
9) David Squires (OU Builders)

Are you asking all these people to validate the same design?  If so then what good is that going to do Greg?  So far you don't have any proof of FE much less OU.  Why don't you work on your own research and until you have real proof then drag everyone into this distraction.  I just don't understand your motives.

Paul

[hartiberlin]

Paul calm down,
just only, because you don?t understand the working of a SMOT,
does not mean, everybody is thinking this way...